Author Topic: : Does Our Media Work For The People 4 ?---------------  (Read 113215 times)

Waco1909 and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53049
  • Reputation: +271/-315
No, you foolishly paid for other people's retirement with all the money that they took out of your paycheck for social security.  That's how the program is structured.  The money current payees contribute is used to pay the benefits to current benefit recipients.

You should have demanded that the government let you fund your own damn retirement when you were working, instead of happily paying for other people's retirement with your money.

I am not as stupid as you.  So, go fund your own damn retirement!!! 😊  Turnabout is fair play.

Payors, not payees.  You are a payee.
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Offline

  • ~
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10710
  • Reputation: +275/-32
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Offline

  • ~
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10710
  • Reputation: +275/-32
Payors, not payees.  You are a payee.
Wasting your time debating a magot.

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
Go walk before gets hotter.

I got big floor fan where house A/C not working much well actually the unit is. Cool in crawlspace but not coming through ducts. They want to replace all ducts and expensive.

78 right now. Be happy if stay that but everything shut, lights off it will still go to 81 if not 82 later today
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
Can't wait.

USA vs. Bosnia Herzegovina 8 PM FOX

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
 Trump says he told new acting director of national intelligence to ‘declassify almost everything’

Said he'd only be in job a month or two
Sad Sad x 1 View List

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
Trump takes maiden flight on new Qatari Air Force One
Sad Sad x 1 View List

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
Are you serious?

Deny visas and no flight to US if pregnant some GOP legislators calling for

GOP officials eye restrictions on pregnant travelers following Supreme Court ruling
How exactly would U.S. officials go about determining whether someone entering the country is pregnant?
How exactly would U.S. officials go about determining whether someone entering the country is pregnant?
MS NOW · ms.now
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Online

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41137
  • Reputation: +439/-590
  • Essayons, Gah-Yah-Tont
"Live long and prosper"

Offline

  • Forum Moderator
  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59128
  • Reputation: +280/-12
Who is appointed to Supreme Court matters.
Clearly in Constitution we see birthright citizenship survived 5-4 with Roberts suggests you can just change law which in this court still fails but close.
They'll never amend Constitution to end it. Birthright citizenship is favored by a good majority
Court clearly shown they have no issue with turning over precedent at any time
Conservatives are turning on Barrett calling her a turncoat. Never mind the law.

Trump’s audacious bid to end birthright citizenship was not an entire loss at the Supreme Court
When President Donald Trump used his black Sharpie on his first day back in office to sign an executive order in January 2025 limiting birthright citizenship, he said, “This is a big one.”
CNN · cnn.com


But the overall Trump effort – as radical as it was – made surprising headway in both the court and public spheres.

The administration gained some mainstream support, including the backing of 25 states and a significant number of members of Congress, for an idea that had long been considered fringe at best. More importantly for the future, while three justices outright dissented, a fourth (Brett Kavanaugh), joined dissenters in finding no 14th Amendment violation. (Kavanaugh signed onto the majority decision blocking Trump’s executive order but based his view on a violation of immigration statutes dating to 1940 and 1952.)


Kavanaugh suggested that Trump might accomplish his goal through new federal legislation.

“Congress could – consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment – amend (the relevant federal laws) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country.”

That concept emboldened Trump and Republican allies Tuesday. The president said in a Truth Social post shortly after the decision in Trump v. Barbara was issued: “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!”

Trump is wrong that any legislation could override the US constitutional guarantee – at least with this current court. A five-justice majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, said the Constitution safeguarded birthright citizenship. He was joined by fellow conservative Amy Coney Barrett and liberals Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Informative Informative x 1 View List

Online

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41137
  • Reputation: +439/-590
  • Essayons, Gah-Yah-Tont
No, you foolishly paid for other people's retirement with all the money that they took out of your paycheck for social security.  That's how the program is structured.  The money current payees contribute is used to pay the benefits to current benefit recipients.

You should have demanded that the government let you fund your own damn retirement when you were working, instead of happily paying for other people's retirement with your money.

I am not as stupid as you.  So, go fund your own damn retirement!!! 😊  Turnabout is fair play.
I have been retired for over 40 years and I do quite well whether I receive Social security or not...As a matter of fact I have not spent one dime of the social security I have received and instead have invested it... You don't see me pitching a bitch over social security or health care here like the rest of you Democrat socialists so don't lecture me about the collective stupidity y'all have...  Y'ALL want health care? THEN GO OUT AND EARN IT, DAMMIT!
"Live long and prosper"

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83136
  • Reputation: +71/-35
  • Vive la résistance!
Who is appointed to Supreme Court matters.
Clearly in Constitution we see birthright citizenship survived 5-4 with Roberts suggests you can just change law which in this court still fails but close.
They'll never amend Constitution to end it. Birthright citizenship is favored by a good majority
Court clearly shown they have no issue with turning over precedent at any time
Conservatives are turning on Barrett calling her a turncoat. Never mind the law.

Trump’s audacious bid to end birthright citizenship was not an entire loss at the Supreme Court
https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/01/politics/trump-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-major-accomplishment-analysis

But the overall Trump effort – as radical as it was – made surprising headway in both the court and public spheres.

The administration gained some mainstream support, including the backing of 25 states and a significant number of members of Congress, for an idea that had long been considered fringe at best. More importantly for the future, while three justices outright dissented, a fourth (Brett Kavanaugh), joined dissenters in finding no 14th Amendment violation. (Kavanaugh signed onto the majority decision blocking Trump’s executive order but based his view on a violation of immigration statutes dating to 1940 and 1952.)


Kavanaugh suggested that Trump might accomplish his goal through new federal legislation.

“Congress could – consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment – amend (the relevant federal laws) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country.”

That concept emboldened Trump and Republican allies Tuesday. The president said in a Truth Social post shortly after the decision in Trump v. Barbara was issued: “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!”

Trump is wrong that any legislation could override the US constitutional guarantee – at least with this current court. A five-justice majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, said the Constitution safeguarded birthright citizenship. He was joined by fellow conservative Amy Coney Barrett and liberals Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Biden should have repaired the SCOTUS but he wasn't brave enough.
IMPEACH  CONVICT  REMOVE

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83136
  • Reputation: +71/-35
  • Vive la résistance!
"...OpenAI Went From $5.09 Billion Net Loss in 2024 to $38.53 Billion Net Loss in 2025..."
IMPEACH  CONVICT  REMOVE
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Online

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41137
  • Reputation: +439/-590
  • Essayons, Gah-Yah-Tont
"Live long and prosper"

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83136
  • Reputation: +71/-35
  • Vive la résistance!
Cool!  Cut them off!


"...'End American Aid': Netanyahu Says Israel No Longer Needs US Assistance..."
IMPEACH  CONVICT  REMOVE

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83136
  • Reputation: +71/-35
  • Vive la résistance!
"...Employers who laid off workers citing AI are already starting to regret it..."
IMPEACH  CONVICT  REMOVE

Online

  • Administrator
  • 200 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 321488
  • Reputation: +580/-91
  • "A countenance more in sorrow than in anger"
  • Location: Topix Too
Love Love x 1 View List

Online

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41137
  • Reputation: +439/-590
  • Essayons, Gah-Yah-Tont
I'd rather take what the gov takes out for SS and invest it in my 401k.
That is a wishful thinking  option that I didn't have so I saved the maximum that I could each week from my salary and invested it in a 401K   while my employer matched that amount.  I run my entire ranch on the Annual Distribution from that 401K with money to spare....  The social security money that I have received for the last 40 years and invested has grown over 400% and I still haven't touched one cent of it... So I certainly don't need any financial advice from anyone but myself..
"Live long and prosper"

 

Topix Too