Author Topic: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.  (Read 1181 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
I think fixing the system is a total revamp of everything, but if we look at this just an issue a big ass wall will fix by keeping people out will fix I think we are looking at it from the wrong angle. So start from scratch stop issusing visa's for work purposes or educational purpose, remove any non documented people, employers stop hiring them as cheap labor, I don't have all the answers but I do know making this into the focus of a campaign is causing more harm. I think the constitution says equality for all but I do know women are still a minority and if you think having the respect of the community just because you don't burn the meatloaf is a goal to aspire to my goals are a bit loftier. I have no axe to grind with men, I like men, but I think respecting each other for just being a child of God is crap, I respect a person for how they carry themselves, are they basically kind and loving, do they treat others with dignity, I try my best to look at humanity with positivity but really most are selfish assholes so in that respect I have equal condemnation for all and prefer the company of dogs


If you think "not burning the meatloaf" is the only thing why women were respected and revered, you are about as ignorant in this subject as you are with discussing the Bible.

Nothing you said proves women are now  better off than they were. So what, you get to vote. But look how much you had to give up for it. That's a high price to pay for you to call it a "victory".


What are your loftier goals?  Besides being unhappy with yourself, discontented and always wanting what someone else has?

BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying

If you think "not burning the meatloaf" is the only thing why women were respected and revered, you are about as ignorant in this subject as you are with discussing the Bible.

Nothing you said proves women are now  better off than they were. So what, you get to vote. But look how much you had to give up for it. That's a high price to pay for you to call it a "victory".


What are your loftier goals?  Besides being unhappy with yourself, discontented and always wanting what someone else has?
Well why else were they respected?, if it wasn't for their domestic abilities?, they sure weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business, being ignorant in this subject is something I most certaintly am not, also not ignorant about the bible either but since we don't see eye to eye on either subject I can see why you would think that. My loftier goals you will probably think are stupid but here it is. Wake up, have an awesome cup of coffee, smoke a cig and make it thru the day without dying. I don't ask nor expect much, I am pretty happy with my life and what I have, which isn't much I got with my own hands, nothing was given to me and I think the victory lies with the fact that women no longer have to depend on men to survive, we have found we can do things, make money, buy and cook the bacon feed and cloth our kids and can hold our heads up instead of relying on a man, not that relying on a man isn't good, and here is where you get me twisted because I do like being able to rely on a man but I can also be relayed upon, I do what I say I am going to do, I take out the trash, I do the laundry I do the dishes, its all about communication and pulling my own weight. So no my dear I am not unhappy with myself, I am not discontented, and I certaintly don't want what others have because if I did I would freakin get it myself
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
Well why else were they respected?, if it wasn't for their domestic abilities?, they sure weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business, being ignorant in this subject is something I most certaintly am not, also not ignorant about the bible either but since we don't see eye to eye on either subject I can see why you would think that. My loftier goals you will probably think are stupid but here it is. Wake up, have an awesome cup of coffee, smoke a cig and make it thru the day without dying. I don't ask nor expect much, I am pretty happy with my life and what I have, which isn't much I got with my own hands, nothing was given to me and I think the victory lies with the fact that women no longer have to depend on men to survive, we have found we can do things, make money, buy and cook the bacon feed and cloth our kids and can hold our heads up instead of relying on a man, not that relying on a man isn't good, and here is where you get me twisted because I do like being able to rely on a man but I can also be relayed upon, I do what I say I am going to do, I take out the trash, I do the laundry I do the dishes, its all about communication and pulling my own weight. So no my dear I am not unhappy with myself, I am not discontented, and I certaintly don't want what others have because if I did I would freakin get it myself

You just described what women did even as far back before suffrage (worked, owned business, managers), so I have no clue what you're talking about when you said they didn't. Like most blacks on slavery, I'm starting to think you get your views about how women were from a Hollywood movie. Conflating a Hollywood movie of sensationalism and entertainment for historical accuracy.

"not relying on a man".  --This is the actual lynch pin of it all. Let's be honest. You wanted to replace the man, to "become" him.



So, let me get this straight. Women allowed their kids to grow up in broken homes, absentee fathers (that's if the girl even knows who it is), more than likely hooked on some type of drugs, disrespected and only seem as a c0ck sleeve for morally defunct men, 3 kids by 3 different sperm donors, Hooking with old men for a pack of smokes, on welfare, no life and no future...

... and all of this, because you women couldn't handle your pen!s envy ???


Wow. 
BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying
You just described what women did even as far back before suffrage (worked, owned business, managers), so I have no clue what you're talking about when you said they didn't. Like most blacks on slavery, I'm starting to think you get your views about how women were from a Hollywood movie. Conflating a Hollywood movie of sensationalism and entertainment for historical accuracy.

"not relying on a man".  --This is the actual lynch pin of it all. Let's be honest. You wanted to replace the man, to "become" him.



So, let me get this straight. Women allowed their kids to grow up in broken homes, absentee fathers (that's if the girl even knows who it is), more than likely hooked on some type of drugs, disrespected and only seem as a c0ck sleeve for morally defunct men, 3 kids by 3 different sperm donors, Hooking with old men for a pack of smokes, on welfare, no life and no future...

... and all of this, because you women couldn't handle your pen!s envy ???


Wow.
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run shit, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry penis envy, hell who needs a penis. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have vagina envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a penis has anything to do with it
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run ****, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry **** envy, hell who needs a ****. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have **** envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a **** has anything to do with it
And btw no I don't want to replace man or become him they still are helpful when it comes to lifting heavy stuff  ;D
Be the change you want to see in the world
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run ****, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry **** envy, hell who needs a ****. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have **** envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a **** has anything to do with it

Sorry, but you still haven't named anything women haven't already done before. The woman's wage gap myth has been dispelled long ago, given the difference in education, hours worked, time taken off, overtime and just plain inferior negotiating skills.

I really think you should pick up a book sometime that isn't the Quarterly Lesbian.










BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying
Sorry, but you still haven't named anything women haven't already done before. The woman's wage gap myth has been dispelled long ago, given the difference in education, hours worked, time taken off, overtime and just plain inferior negotiating skills.

I really think you should pick up a book sometime that isn't the Quarterly Lesbian.
Seriously?, those very things I mentioned, women being Doctors, lawyers, surgeons, owners of business and cEO's of companies those are things that women have accomplished, sorry you don't get it, maybe you have been in a coma for the last 100 years but things have changed its not leave it beaver anymore. You speak of education women weren't given the opportunity to get a higher education unless you consider Secretary School higher education, come on you know better
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
Seriously?, those very things I mentioned, women being Doctors, lawyers, surgeons, owners of business and cEO's of companies those are things that women have accomplished, sorry you don't get it, maybe you have been in a coma for the last 100 years but things have changed its not leave it beaver anymore. You speak of education women weren't given the opportunity to get a higher education unless you consider Secretary School higher education, come on you know better

You made the claim that women "weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business".
Clearly, history proves you wrong, even stretching way back into early American history before the "leave it to beaver" days.  This is the point where you should pick up a book and educate yourself. I'm not going to spoon feed you on every subject, over things that are common knowledge.

Now, if you want to debate how wide spread women where doing those things, then we can do that.  But to say they "were not" doing those things is patently false. You also still haven't convinced me women are better off with their "equality".

They get to vote, OK...and?  Are they better off for it? I mean, besides the "we got rid of men" thing. Because that seems what it is really about. You can't even help to continually admit that's what it's about "we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men" -J50.    I want you Joanna, to tell me what women gained?

OK, now women have left the home en masse. And because women are naturally better nurturers than men, are now not at home doing their biological role. Now our sons are growing up shooting each other in school, our daughters are now exponentially being made to live on welfare, multiple kids by multiple sexual partners, hooked on drugs, prostituting, broken homes along with a whole slew of developmental problems.

... and somehow this is a "win" according to (feminist) women? 




Looking objectively, I think women gave up one falsely perceived, "boogieman" taskmaster (gender roles) for a far more dangerous one - unchecked pen!s envy.  Convince me that I'm wrong.
BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3485
  • Reputation: +0/-0

Touche'

Very cryptic. Like two ships in the night, outlined only by the heavenly stars. We passed each other, knowing each other, without ever speaking a word.

Sure, but this is what MY ship looks like.


Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying
You made the claim that women "weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business".
Clearly, history proves you wrong, even stretching way back into early American history before the "leave it to beaver" days.  This is the point where you should pick up a book and educate yourself. I'm not going to spoon feed you on every subject, over things that are common knowledge.

Now, if you want to debate how wide spread women where doing those things, then we can do that.  But to say they "were not" doing those things is patently false. You also still haven't convinced me women are better off with their "equality".

They get to vote, OK...and?  Are they better off for it? I mean, besides the "we got rid of men" thing. Because that seems what it is really about. You can't even help to continually admit that's what it's about "we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men" -J50.    I want you Joanna, to tell me what women gained?

OK, now women have left the home en masse. And because women are naturally better nurturers than men, are now not at home doing their biological role. Now our sons are growing up shooting each other in school, our daughters are now exponentially being made to live on welfare, multiple kids by multiple sexual partners, hooked on drugs, prostituting, broken homes along with a whole slew of developmental problems.

... and somehow this is a "win" according to (feminist) women? 




Looking objectively, I think women gave up one falsely perceived, "boogieman" taskmaster (gender roles) for a far more dangerous one - unchecked pen!s envy.  Convince me that I'm wrong.
I did not realize I had to be literal when I spoke about women weren't CEO's or doctors, I correct that to mean perhaps maybe 2 in a million, ffs you know what I meant yet your grasping at straws in trying to make a valid point is cute. You keep blathering on about this penis envy thing, why should women be envious we don't need it, its just a appendage not really useful in the big scheme of things, convince me I am wrong and why I am envious of something I don't need. Our sons are shooting up schools because the parents aren't teaching them morals and values, if you look at why the shootings occur you will see the crux of the problem lies with bullying, not being raised by a single parent heck when 2 cant even do the job
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
Sure, but this is what MY ship looks like.




Wow, Der.


It's not like you to post white supremacist propaganda.


White man wearing Klan Robes with what looks to be "traditional blackface" on (black stripe across his eyes) , heralding the colonialism of the white man. Those three long blond haired angelic super-beings pointing the way to white destiny, representing the 3 angels of Revelations that foretold and prepared the world for the second coming of it's savior (The white man).  Hell, they even have an Uncle Tom dancing and singing a jig on the boat to entertain the white folks on their journey. The only two  'black' knights on board, guess where they were??? That's right... all. back. of. the. boat.

Tell me I'm wrong.



I seriously hope you can't look at this video again the same after reading this, since you made me sit and watch it. Good song, tho. Thanks.
BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
I did not realize I had to be literal when I spoke about women weren't CEO's or doctors, I correct that to mean perhaps maybe 2 in a million, ffs you know what I meant yet your grasping at straws in trying to make a valid point is cute. You keep blathering on about this **** envy thing, why should women be envious we don't need it, its just a appendage not really useful in the big scheme of things, convince me I am wrong and why I am envious of something I don't need. Our sons are shooting up schools because the parents aren't teaching them morals and values, if you look at why the shootings occur you will see the crux of the problem lies with bullying, not being raised by a single parent heck when 2 cant even do the job


Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.
BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying

Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.
Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have penis envy because I don't need one perhaps you have vagina envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have **** envy because I don't need one perhaps you have **** envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you

That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question





BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying
That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question
Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich


Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, **** and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.



BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 252
  • Reputation: +22/-2
  • Get busy living or get busy dying

Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, **** and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.
We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's
Be the change you want to see in the world

Offline

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Reputation: +12/-0
We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's

Like black people, you women want an award for any and everything you do, it's like watching the special  Olympics. It truly is.

You act like women never survived without a man before. You think every woman on this earth always had a man, or wasn't widowed and still had to survive?  My God, you are so naive.  And your disdain for men blinds you that women gained nothing.

Sadly, more and more  "ho" moms are being produced, despite your claim that it's the "loon white christian male ending abortion" going to cause it. Remember, you feminist called this the "sexual revolution". Least your cognitive dissonance is giving way and allowing you, even if it's only subconsciously, to admit the problem (truth) to yourself. Today hasn't been a total waste.
BEHOLD !!!

I am Pen!s envy, destroyer of women's happiness.

 

Topix Too