Welcome To Topix Too Forum

General Chat And Non Game Boards => Current Events => Topic started by: Der Fuehrer on February 24, 2019, 07:04:07 am


Title: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 24, 2019, 07:04:07 am
Watch the video.  I keep waiting for her to pull someone's hair.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/climate/feinstein-sunrise-green-new-deal.html
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 24, 2019, 11:26:47 am
Watch the video.  I keep waiting for her to pull someone's hair.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/climate/feinstein-sunrise-green-new-deal.html
That or steal their lunch money
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 24, 2019, 11:35:24 pm
Well, she isn't wrong. Probably the first time an adult told those poor brainwashed children, and adults, the truth of how the world works.

Just look at those grotesque 1,000  c0ck stare, single mom, generational welfare incubators who couldn't even dress themselves, or their kids, presentable to meet a Senator. My God!


Also, this...

"I remember when you got elected, I was a child at the time"....... Coming from a woman who looks like she is in her early 50's, I don't think she won over any favors with the Senator with this comment.


 Was comedic to say the least.  Thanks, Der.


Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 01:02:04 am
Well, she isn't wrong. Probably the first time an adult told those poor brainwashed children, and adults, the truth of how the world works.

Just look at those grotesque 1,000  c0ck stare, single mom, generational welfare incubators who couldn't even dress themselves, or their kids, presentable to meet a Senator. My God!


Also, this...

"I remember when you got elected, I was a child at the time"....... Coming from a woman who looks like she is in her early 50's, I don't think she won over any favors with the Senator with this comment.


 Was comedic to say the least.  Thanks, Der.
Well she is disillusioned to say the least as the world is in crisis, our environment is destabilizing and changing, not for the better and its not something that's normal. Glad I will be dead when people have to live on mars
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 25, 2019, 07:33:59 am
Well, she isn't wrong. Probably the first time an adult told those poor brainwashed children, and adults, the truth of how the world works.


Just because that is "the truth of how the world works", doesn't mean there can't be something done to change that.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 25, 2019, 07:35:43 am
Glad I will be dead when people have to live on mars

I dunno, I hear Mars is beautiful this time of year.  And green IS my favorite color.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 08:26:14 am
I dunno, I hear Mars is beautiful this time of year.  And green IS my favorite color.
I thought Mars was the red planet?
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 25, 2019, 08:30:35 am
I thought Mars was the red planet?

Indeed, with little green men.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 25, 2019, 10:25:04 am
Just because that is "the truth of how the world works", doesn't mean there can't be something done to change that.

Very true, but pushing a bill thru that has zero chance of being passed is a waste of everyone's time, wouldn't you agree?

I do believe Feinstein said that the bill they have ready had a good chance of passing. They should of stopped playing party politics, gave Trump his 5 billion, then asked for 5 billion for whatever program they wanted in trade. But then again, if a wall is built how else will the Dems ever win another election without the flood of 3rd world socialists pouring into our country to vote for them? 


Der, it's official, you've talk to me more this last week on here than you ever did in the  6-ish years on topix. Good to finally meet you.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 10:30:46 am
Very true, but pushing a bill thru that has zero chance of being passed is a waste of everyone's time, wouldn't you agree?

I do believe Feinstein said that the bill they have ready had a good chance of passing. They should of stopped playing party politics, gave Trump his 5 billion, then asked for 5 billion for whatever program they wanted in trade. But then again, if a wall is built how else will the Dems ever win another election without the flood of 3rd world socialists pouring into our country to vote for them? 


Der, it's official, you've talk to me more this last week on here than you ever did in the  6-ish years on topix. Good to finally meet you.
I thought that's how Trump won, or can you include Russia as 3rd world socialists, fyi Mexico is paying for that wall cause everybody knows Trump is the master of truth
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 10:31:38 am
Indeed, with little green men.
Oh I forgot about those
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 25, 2019, 11:31:10 am
I thought that's how Trump won, or can you include Russia as 3rd world socialists, fyi Mexico is paying for that wall cause everybody knows Trump is the master of truth

Directly, indirectly or by the US taxpayer, it doesn't matter as long as it's built. Anyone who believes a politician is able to keep 100% of what he promises on a campaign trail needs a reality check.


Personally, I'd rather them just start shooting illegals that cross as enemy combatants if they don't apply through proper channels.


Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 12:30:50 pm
Directly, indirectly or by the US taxpayer, it doesn't matter as long as it's built. Anyone who believes a politician is able to keep 100% of what he promises on a campaign trail needs a reality check.


Personally, I'd rather them just start shooting illegals that cross as enemy combatants if they don't apply through proper channels.
Well I think fixing the broken system would save on ammunition, but if you condone mass murder then that's your choice
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 25, 2019, 02:48:11 pm

Der, it's official, you've talk to me more this last week on here than you ever did in the  6-ish years on topix. Good to finally meet you.

Just because you never listened that doesn't mean I never talked to you.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 25, 2019, 10:24:57 pm
Well I think fixing the broken system would save on ammunition, but if you condone mass murder then that's your choice


Fix the broken system? Well, whites tried to fix the low IQ of non-whites Via colonialism, so there was no need for them to flood our home countries. We brought railroads, schools, education, hospitals and technology to these poor dumb basterds but nobody wanted that. We left, and they mostly took a pre-made modern civilization and destroyed it back into a heap of bricks. What they do want is, all the benefits of 'whitey' without putting in any work. Global welfare to non-whites.

Coming from a fanatical liberal who thinks killing unborn children is a right. Someone who joined the military and if memory serves me correctly, was station in Germany at at a strategic missile defense airbase?  Can't recall that last part exactly, you and Gonnagetcha was too busy measuring dicks to pay attention.

Pot meet Kettle.




Just because you never listened that doesn't mean I never talked to you.


Touche'

Very cryptic. Like two ships in the night, outlined only by the heavenly stars. We passed each other, knowing each other, without ever speaking a word.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 25, 2019, 10:56:31 pm

Fix the broken system? Well, whites tried to fix the low IQ of non-whites Via colonialism, so there was no need for them to flood our home countries. We brought railroads, schools, education, hospitals and technology to these poor dumb basterds but nobody wanted that. We left, and they mostly took a pre-made modern civilization and destroyed it back into a heap of bricks. What they do want is, all the benefits of 'whitey' without putting in any work. Global welfare to non-whites.

Coming from a fanatical liberal who thinks killing unborn children is a right. Someone who joined the military and if memory serves me correctly, was station in Germany at at a strategic missile defense airbase?  Can't recall that last part exactly, you and Gonnagetcha was too busy measuring dicks to pay attention.

Pot meet Kettle.





Touche'

Very cryptic. Like two ships in the night, outlined only by the heavenly stars. We passed each other, knowing each other, without ever speaking a word.
Well isn't the system broken?, seems like it is to me and I say that as not a fanatical liberal but as a person with a functioning brain, but far be it from me to reign on your I am a white male so therefore entitled parade. And yes I am a veteran, the missile site has been without the missiles since they were no longer in service and my dick was bigger than his btw. And I don't think abortion is a right I do believe it is a choice cause God knows all you white conservative males knows what's best and would only **** about taking care of them when half the population goes on welfare, but God help the poor kids who have already been born that struggle to eat and have a safe place to live free from the judgment of crazed Christian loons who say abortion is wrong so even though I don't know the circumstances of the situation we will force you to be born and be a drain on society and **** about it the whole time
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 26, 2019, 12:18:38 am
Well isn't the system broken?, seems like it is to me and I say that as not a fanatical liberal but as a person with a functioning brain, but far be it from me to reign on your I am a white male so therefore entitled parade. And yes I am a veteran, the missile site has been without the missiles since they were no longer in service and my dick was bigger than his btw. And I don't think abortion is a right I do believe it is a choice cause God knows all you white conservative males knows what's best and would only **** about taking care of them when half the population goes on welfare, but God help the poor kids who have already been born that struggle to eat and have a safe place to live free from the judgment of crazed Christian loons who say abortion is wrong so even though I don't know the circumstances of the situation we will force you to be born and be a drain on society and **** about it the whole time

Naturally, I figured you would give your perspective on how to fix it. Since you didn't, I'll ask what do you think needs to be done in order to fix it? A real answer, not your copy and paste, window slobbering "Impeach Trump" replies.

Don't you think it's a little hypocritical to say minorities need protections and they are in danger. But turn around and say the white race can't have the protection of homogeneous countries in order to live and strive, being that any other race out numbers us and that we ourselves, are a minority in the world?

Don't you think it's hypocritical to say (forced) diversity is good, then condemn the whites for colonialism?

So when you say "Self-entitled" white male, I find it hypocritical that you only apply that title to whites only, when we have hoardes of non-whites flooding into the US because they think they are entitled to do so. 

---------------

Ah, yes. The never ending welfare baby breeding, single mom incubator explosion went to near extinct levels when those dirty white christian, conservative males lost any real power over women's bodies back in the 60's with the sexual revolution and women's suffrage earlier. Disaster averted! ...However, reality says different.

It most be really horrible for women to know these types of people want you to be more responsible with your bodies. That you are something special, besides being a cvm dump for morally defunct men. I mean, it must be really "empowering" to have 3 kids by 3 different men, living on welfare, more than likely hooked on some type of drug for escapism, sleeping with old men so you can buy Christmas presents for your kids and using the US Government as a surrogate father.     But hey, you get to vote!  Must of been real horrible for your great grandmothers to have a stable home, raise a family and to be respected as a women not only in the home, but in the community as well.   Oh' The horrors!




If you're trying to convince me, or anyone for that matter, this is the fruits of your "equality". I say it serves more as a warning against it, than for it.














 








Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 26, 2019, 04:56:16 am
Naturally, I figured you would give your perspective on how to fix it. Since you didn't, I'll ask what do you think needs to be done in order to fix it? A real answer, not your copy and paste, window slobbering "Impeach Trump" replies.

Don't you think it's a little hypocritical to say minorities need protections and they are in danger. But turn around and say the white race can't have the protection of homogeneous countries in order to live and strive, being that any other race out numbers us and that we ourselves, are a minority in the world?

Don't you think it's hypocritical to say (forced) diversity is good, then condemn the whites for colonialism?

So when you say "Self-entitled" white male, I find it hypocritical that you only apply that title to whites only, when we have hoardes of non-whites flooding into the US because they think they are entitled to do so. 

---------------

Ah, yes. The never ending welfare baby breeding, single mom incubator explosion went to near extinct levels when those dirty white christian, conservative males lost any real power over women's bodies back in the 60's with the sexual revolution and women's suffrage earlier. Disaster averted! ...However, reality says different.

It most be really horrible for women to know these types of people want you to be more responsible with your bodies. That you are something special, besides being a cvm dump for morally defunct men. I mean, it must be really "empowering" to have 3 kids by 3 different men, living on welfare, more than likely hooked on some type of drug for escapism, sleeping with old men so you can buy Christmas presents for your kids and using the US Government as a surrogate father.     But hey, you get to vote!  Must of been real horrible for your great grandmothers to have a stable home, raise a family and to be respected as a women not only in the home, but in the community as well.   Oh' The horrors!




If you're trying to convince me, or anyone for that matter, this is the fruits of your "equality". I say it serves more as a warning against it, than for it.
I think fixing the system is a total revamp of everything, but if we look at this just an issue a big ass wall will fix by keeping people out will fix I think we are looking at it from the wrong angle. So start from scratch stop issusing visa's for work purposes or educational purpose, remove any non documented people, employers stop hiring them as cheap labor, I don't have all the answers but I do know making this into the focus of a campaign is causing more harm. I think the constitution says equality for all but I do know women are still a minority and if you think having the respect of the community just because you don't burn the meatloaf is a goal to aspire to my goals are a bit loftier. I have no axe to grind with men, I like men, but I think respecting each other for just being a child of God is crap, I respect a person for how they carry themselves, are they basically kind and loving, do they treat others with dignity, I try my best to look at humanity with positivity but really most are selfish **** so in that respect I have equal condemnation for all and prefer the company of dogs
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 26, 2019, 06:26:29 am
I think fixing the system is a total revamp of everything, but if we look at this just an issue a big ass wall will fix by keeping people out will fix I think we are looking at it from the wrong angle. So start from scratch stop issusing visa's for work purposes or educational purpose, remove any non documented people, employers stop hiring them as cheap labor, I don't have all the answers but I do know making this into the focus of a campaign is causing more harm. I think the constitution says equality for all but I do know women are still a minority and if you think having the respect of the community just because you don't burn the meatloaf is a goal to aspire to my goals are a bit loftier. I have no axe to grind with men, I like men, but I think respecting each other for just being a child of God is crap, I respect a person for how they carry themselves, are they basically kind and loving, do they treat others with dignity, I try my best to look at humanity with positivity but really most are selfish **** so in that respect I have equal condemnation for all and prefer the company of dogs


If you think "not burning the meatloaf" is the only thing why women were respected and revered, you are about as ignorant in this subject as you are with discussing the Bible.

Nothing you said proves women are now  better off than they were. So what, you get to vote. But look how much you had to give up for it. That's a high price to pay for you to call it a "victory".


What are your loftier goals?  Besides being unhappy with yourself, discontented and always wanting what someone else has?

Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 26, 2019, 07:25:44 am

If you think "not burning the meatloaf" is the only thing why women were respected and revered, you are about as ignorant in this subject as you are with discussing the Bible.

Nothing you said proves women are now  better off than they were. So what, you get to vote. But look how much you had to give up for it. That's a high price to pay for you to call it a "victory".


What are your loftier goals?  Besides being unhappy with yourself, discontented and always wanting what someone else has?
Well why else were they respected?, if it wasn't for their domestic abilities?, they sure weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business, being ignorant in this subject is something I most certaintly am not, also not ignorant about the bible either but since we don't see eye to eye on either subject I can see why you would think that. My loftier goals you will probably think are stupid but here it is. Wake up, have an awesome cup of coffee, smoke a cig and make it thru the day without dying. I don't ask nor expect much, I am pretty happy with my life and what I have, which isn't much I got with my own hands, nothing was given to me and I think the victory lies with the fact that women no longer have to depend on men to survive, we have found we can do things, make money, buy and cook the bacon feed and cloth our kids and can hold our heads up instead of relying on a man, not that relying on a man isn't good, and here is where you get me twisted because I do like being able to rely on a man but I can also be relayed upon, I do what I say I am going to do, I take out the trash, I do the laundry I do the dishes, its all about communication and pulling my own weight. So no my dear I am not unhappy with myself, I am not discontented, and I certaintly don't want what others have because if I did I would freakin get it myself
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 26, 2019, 10:05:30 am
Well why else were they respected?, if it wasn't for their domestic abilities?, they sure weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business, being ignorant in this subject is something I most certaintly am not, also not ignorant about the bible either but since we don't see eye to eye on either subject I can see why you would think that. My loftier goals you will probably think are stupid but here it is. Wake up, have an awesome cup of coffee, smoke a cig and make it thru the day without dying. I don't ask nor expect much, I am pretty happy with my life and what I have, which isn't much I got with my own hands, nothing was given to me and I think the victory lies with the fact that women no longer have to depend on men to survive, we have found we can do things, make money, buy and cook the bacon feed and cloth our kids and can hold our heads up instead of relying on a man, not that relying on a man isn't good, and here is where you get me twisted because I do like being able to rely on a man but I can also be relayed upon, I do what I say I am going to do, I take out the trash, I do the laundry I do the dishes, its all about communication and pulling my own weight. So no my dear I am not unhappy with myself, I am not discontented, and I certaintly don't want what others have because if I did I would freakin get it myself

You just described what women did even as far back before suffrage (worked, owned business, managers), so I have no clue what you're talking about when you said they didn't. Like most blacks on slavery, I'm starting to think you get your views about how women were from a Hollywood movie. Conflating a Hollywood movie of sensationalism and entertainment for historical accuracy.

"not relying on a man".  --This is the actual lynch pin of it all. Let's be honest. You wanted to replace the man, to "become" him.



So, let me get this straight. Women allowed their kids to grow up in broken homes, absentee fathers (that's if the girl even knows who it is), more than likely hooked on some type of drugs, disrespected and only seem as a c0ck sleeve for morally defunct men, 3 kids by 3 different sperm donors, Hooking with old men for a pack of smokes, on welfare, no life and no future...

... and all of this, because you women couldn't handle your pen!s envy ???


Wow. 
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 26, 2019, 11:31:38 am
You just described what women did even as far back before suffrage (worked, owned business, managers), so I have no clue what you're talking about when you said they didn't. Like most blacks on slavery, I'm starting to think you get your views about how women were from a Hollywood movie. Conflating a Hollywood movie of sensationalism and entertainment for historical accuracy.

"not relying on a man".  --This is the actual lynch pin of it all. Let's be honest. You wanted to replace the man, to "become" him.



So, let me get this straight. Women allowed their kids to grow up in broken homes, absentee fathers (that's if the girl even knows who it is), more than likely hooked on some type of drugs, disrespected and only seem as a c0ck sleeve for morally defunct men, 3 kids by 3 different sperm donors, Hooking with old men for a pack of smokes, on welfare, no life and no future...

... and all of this, because you women couldn't handle your pen!s envy ???


Wow.
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run ****, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry **** envy, hell who needs a ****. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have **** envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a **** has anything to do with it
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 26, 2019, 11:34:56 am
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run ****, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry **** envy, hell who needs a ****. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have **** envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a **** has anything to do with it
And btw no I don't want to replace man or become him they still are helpful when it comes to lifting heavy stuff  ;D
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 26, 2019, 12:02:10 pm
No they didn't own their own business nor were CEO's wtf are you living in some kind of dream world, wait I get it now you are just yanking my chain because history has shown us women were treated differently, we were secretaries to the men who had companies, we were nurses to the doctors, now a days women own and run ****, we are doctors, lawyers, surgeons, we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men see that's what ticks you off you cry **** envy, hell who needs a ****. Why have the women's movement when we already had our own companies, you think that makes any sense, I mean why fight for equal pay and treatment when we already had it, all this is what you just said so im starting to think maybe you just have **** envy cause that's the most logical explanation. Far as envy I don't think having a **** has anything to do with it

Sorry, but you still haven't named anything women haven't already done before. The woman's wage gap myth has been dispelled long ago, given the difference in education, hours worked, time taken off, overtime and just plain inferior negotiating skills.

I really think you should pick up a book sometime that isn't the Quarterly Lesbian.










Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 26, 2019, 01:16:38 pm
Sorry, but you still haven't named anything women haven't already done before. The woman's wage gap myth has been dispelled long ago, given the difference in education, hours worked, time taken off, overtime and just plain inferior negotiating skills.

I really think you should pick up a book sometime that isn't the Quarterly Lesbian.
Seriously?, those very things I mentioned, women being Doctors, lawyers, surgeons, owners of business and cEO's of companies those are things that women have accomplished, sorry you don't get it, maybe you have been in a coma for the last 100 years but things have changed its not leave it beaver anymore. You speak of education women weren't given the opportunity to get a higher education unless you consider Secretary School higher education, come on you know better
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 26, 2019, 10:50:31 pm
Seriously?, those very things I mentioned, women being Doctors, lawyers, surgeons, owners of business and cEO's of companies those are things that women have accomplished, sorry you don't get it, maybe you have been in a coma for the last 100 years but things have changed its not leave it beaver anymore. You speak of education women weren't given the opportunity to get a higher education unless you consider Secretary School higher education, come on you know better

You made the claim that women "weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business".
Clearly, history proves you wrong, even stretching way back into early American history before the "leave it to beaver" days.  This is the point where you should pick up a book and educate yourself. I'm not going to spoon feed you on every subject, over things that are common knowledge.

Now, if you want to debate how wide spread women where doing those things, then we can do that.  But to say they "were not" doing those things is patently false. You also still haven't convinced me women are better off with their "equality".

They get to vote, OK...and?  Are they better off for it? I mean, besides the "we got rid of men" thing. Because that seems what it is really about. You can't even help to continually admit that's what it's about "we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men" -J50.    I want you Joanna, to tell me what women gained?

OK, now women have left the home en masse. And because women are naturally better nurturers than men, are now not at home doing their biological role. Now our sons are growing up shooting each other in school, our daughters are now exponentially being made to live on welfare, multiple kids by multiple sexual partners, hooked on drugs, prostituting, broken homes along with a whole slew of developmental problems.

... and somehow this is a "win" according to (feminist) women? 




Looking objectively, I think women gave up one falsely perceived, "boogieman" taskmaster (gender roles) for a far more dangerous one - unchecked pen!s envy.  Convince me that I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Der Fuehrer on February 27, 2019, 08:09:48 am

Touche'

Very cryptic. Like two ships in the night, outlined only by the heavenly stars. We passed each other, knowing each other, without ever speaking a word.

Sure, but this is what MY ship looks like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dGj9h8ggCc
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 27, 2019, 09:26:02 am
You made the claim that women "weren't CEO's or managers, or gasp owners of a business".
Clearly, history proves you wrong, even stretching way back into early American history before the "leave it to beaver" days.  This is the point where you should pick up a book and educate yourself. I'm not going to spoon feed you on every subject, over things that are common knowledge.

Now, if you want to debate how wide spread women where doing those things, then we can do that.  But to say they "were not" doing those things is patently false. You also still haven't convinced me women are better off with their "equality".

They get to vote, OK...and?  Are they better off for it? I mean, besides the "we got rid of men" thing. Because that seems what it is really about. You can't even help to continually admit that's what it's about "we are rocking it cause we rock and we do it without men" -J50.    I want you Joanna, to tell me what women gained?

OK, now women have left the home en masse. And because women are naturally better nurturers than men, are now not at home doing their biological role. Now our sons are growing up shooting each other in school, our daughters are now exponentially being made to live on welfare, multiple kids by multiple sexual partners, hooked on drugs, prostituting, broken homes along with a whole slew of developmental problems.

... and somehow this is a "win" according to (feminist) women? 




Looking objectively, I think women gave up one falsely perceived, "boogieman" taskmaster (gender roles) for a far more dangerous one - unchecked pen!s envy.  Convince me that I'm wrong.
I did not realize I had to be literal when I spoke about women weren't CEO's or doctors, I correct that to mean perhaps maybe 2 in a million, ffs you know what I meant yet your grasping at straws in trying to make a valid point is cute. You keep blathering on about this **** envy thing, why should women be envious we don't need it, its just a appendage not really useful in the big scheme of things, convince me I am wrong and why I am envious of something I don't need. Our sons are shooting up schools because the parents aren't teaching them morals and values, if you look at why the shootings occur you will see the crux of the problem lies with bullying, not being raised by a single parent heck when 2 cant even do the job
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 10:21:19 am
Sure, but this is what MY ship looks like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dGj9h8ggCc


Wow, Der.


It's not like you to post white supremacist propaganda.


White man wearing Klan Robes with what looks to be "traditional blackface" on (black stripe across his eyes) , heralding the colonialism of the white man. Those three long blond haired angelic super-beings pointing the way to white destiny, representing the 3 angels of Revelations that foretold and prepared the world for the second coming of it's savior (The white man).  Hell, they even have an Uncle Tom dancing and singing a jig on the boat to entertain the white folks on their journey. The only two  'black' knights on board, guess where they were??? That's right... all. back. of. the. boat.

Tell me I'm wrong.



I seriously hope you can't look at this video again the same after reading this, since you made me sit and watch it. Good song, tho. Thanks.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 11:01:33 am
I did not realize I had to be literal when I spoke about women weren't CEO's or doctors, I correct that to mean perhaps maybe 2 in a million, ffs you know what I meant yet your grasping at straws in trying to make a valid point is cute. You keep blathering on about this **** envy thing, why should women be envious we don't need it, its just a appendage not really useful in the big scheme of things, convince me I am wrong and why I am envious of something I don't need. Our sons are shooting up schools because the parents aren't teaching them morals and values, if you look at why the shootings occur you will see the crux of the problem lies with bullying, not being raised by a single parent heck when 2 cant even do the job


Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 27, 2019, 11:28:17 am

Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.
Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have **** envy because I don't need one perhaps you have **** envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 11:48:29 am
Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have **** envy because I don't need one perhaps you have **** envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you

That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question





Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 27, 2019, 12:38:53 pm
That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question
Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 01:37:10 pm
Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich


Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, prostitution and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.



Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 27, 2019, 02:15:59 pm

Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, prostitution and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.
We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 03:16:53 pm
We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's

Like black people, you women want an award for any and everything you do, it's like watching the special  Olympics. It truly is.

You act like women never survived without a man before. You think every woman on this earth always had a man, or wasn't widowed and still had to survive?  My God, you are so naive.  And your disdain for men blinds you that women gained nothing.

Sadly, more and more  "ho" moms are being produced, despite your claim that it's the "loon white christian male ending abortion" going to cause it. Remember, you feminist called this the "sexual revolution". Least your cognitive dissonance is giving way and allowing you, even if it's only subconsciously, to admit the problem (truth) to yourself. Today hasn't been a total waste.
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 27, 2019, 10:00:22 pm
Like black people, you women want an award for any and everything you do, it's like watching the special  Olympics. It truly is.

You act like women never survived without a man before. You think every woman on this earth always had a man, or wasn't widowed and still had to survive?  My God, you are so naive.  And your disdain for men blinds you that women gained nothing.

Sadly, more and more  "ho" moms are being produced, despite your claim that it's the "loon white christian male ending abortion" going to cause it. Remember, you feminist called this the "sexual revolution". Least your cognitive dissonance is giving way and allowing you, even if it's only subconsciously, to admit the problem (truth) to yourself. Today hasn't been a total waste.
Comparing women to black people, was that an after thought or trying to tie your nonsensical thoughts into a semblance of a point. I never implied women always had a man but societies attitude was women married, raised the kids and kept the house and I think other than being able to vote which if you really think about it our vote doesn't count, nobody's does except those old white rich men who have the power. And once again I don't disdain men I disdain this self entitled attitude but I don't exclude others who have it like young people and lazy people, most of humanity actually like I said before I disdain everybody so me being a man hater isn't the issue. It wasn't women who called it the sexual revolution society called it that. And more Ho moms being produced?, really you should be happy about that after all you are forcing others to comply with that you think is best for them, ah the arrogance of man such a musky smell
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 27, 2019, 10:42:05 pm
Comparing women to black people, was that an after thought or trying to tie your nonsensical thoughts into a semblance of a point. I never implied women always had a man but societies attitude was women married, raised the kids and kept the house and I think other than being able to vote which if you really think about it our vote doesn't count, nobody's does except those old white rich men who have the power. And once again I don't disdain men I disdain this self entitled attitude but I don't exclude others who have it like young people and lazy people, most of humanity actually like I said before I disdain everybody so me being a man hater isn't the issue. It wasn't women who called it the sexual revolution society called it that. And more Ho moms being produced?, really you should be happy about that after all you are forcing others to comply with that you think is best for them, ah the arrogance of man such a musky smell

"those old white rich men"-J50   I think you repeating these anti-male sentiments says everything we need to know about your hypocrisy and feigned moral superiority of "equality".


I also don't remember making a comment where I was forcing anyone to do anything. So, if you could point that out where I did, maybe we can sort your confusion out. I did however, make a statement on what nature/God intended women to do comparative to your statement that "white christian males who wanted to end abortion, causing an explosion in welfare ho's.", that you made at the beginning of this conversation.  Maybe you forgot that's what this discussion was about?


If you can't remember what is being discussed and why, it will be futile to continue on any further.





 



Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 28, 2019, 09:18:30 am
"those old white rich men"-J50   I think you repeating these anti-male sentiments says everything we need to know about your hypocrisy and feigned moral superiority of "equality".


I also don't remember making a comment where I was forcing anyone to do anything. So, if you could point that out where I did, maybe we can sort your confusion out. I did however, make a statement on what nature/God intended women to do comparative to your statement that "white christian males who wanted to end abortion, causing an explosion in welfare ho's.", that you made at the beginning of this conversation.  Maybe you forgot that's what this discussion was about?


If you can't remember what is being discussed and why, it will be futile to continue on any further.
I have to repeat it because that's the truth of the matter, its like you aren't seeing the forest for the tree's, I firmly believe that there is a group of old. white men who have an agenda and because they are extremely rich and powerful but only because they are rich not by any contribution they made to society. Have you heard of the Bilderberg group I think its the name, anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses, that simple
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 28, 2019, 10:28:36 am
I have to repeat it because that's the truth of the matter, its like you aren't seeing the forest for the tree's, I firmly believe that there is a group of old. white men who have an agenda and because they are extremely rich and powerful but only because they are rich not by any contribution they made to society. Have you heard of the Bilderberg group I think its the name, anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses, that simple

Yes, I understand the truth of the matter is you feminist have pen!s envy and blaming a "boogieman" for your worsening problems since you got your failed "equality". Look at the explosion of single moms on welfare, with multiple kids by multiple men, broken absentee fatherless homes (sorry, I guess that's a victory?), hooked on drugs and welfare. Women have already been doing the other things you named. Feminism has pushed whole generations of other women in the gutter to satisfy their hatred of all thing male. - "feminism"


I asked you to name me what women have gained for their  "equality". You only managed to name 2 things; Voting and 'got rid of men'.


"anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses"- You are pro-Obama/liberal.  "Obamacare" is THE most intrusive governmental program into women's healthcare. What are you even blabbering about. That CG acting up again?





Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 28, 2019, 12:52:43 pm
Yes, I understand the truth of the matter is you feminist have pen!s envy and blaming a "boogieman" for your worsening problems since you got your failed "equality". Look at the explosion of single moms on welfare, with multiple kids by multiple men, broken absentee fatherless homes (sorry, I guess that's a victory?), hooked on drugs and welfare. Women have already been doing the other things you named. Feminism has pushed whole generations of other women in the gutter to satisfy their hatred of all thing male. - "feminism"


I asked you to name me what women have gained for their  "equality". You only managed to name 2 things; Voting and 'got rid of men'.


"anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses"- You are pro-Obama/liberal.  "Obamacare" is THE most intrusive governmental program into women's healthcare. What are you even blabbering about. That CG acting up again?
You keep saying the same things so its apparent you have a closed mind this conversation seems to just go in circles, I don't chase my own tail
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Window Lickers Union on February 28, 2019, 03:07:18 pm
You keep saying the same things so its apparent you have a closed mind this conversation seems to just go in circles, I don't chase my own tail


I've asked several question you have failed to answer. I even asked again for you to answer them- you still refused.


Then you have the audacity to call me "closed mind(ed)". I don't think anyone would call somebody asking question's on a subject or somebodies view for more information, to be informed "close minded".



But good try on trying to bow out of the conversation , still refusing to answer them.



Cute.


Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: joanna50 on February 28, 2019, 07:33:41 pm

I've asked several question you have failed to answer. I even asked again for you to answer them- you still refused.


Then you have the audacity to call me "closed mind(ed)". I don't think anyone would call somebody asking question's on a subject or somebodies view for more information, to be informed "close minded".



But good try on trying to bow out of the conversation , still refusing to answer them.



Cute.
What questions have you asked that I failed to answer?, to keep saying I and women have **** envy is a judgmental statement and implies that you do have a closed mind
Title: Re: Politics aside, Dianne Feinstein should not be allowed to interact with children.
Post by: Ride The Lightning on February 28, 2019, 07:38:05 pm
Jeeebus, is she still around???  I used to call her Feinenstein...because she looked like Dr. Kervorkian built her in his laboratory...