Welcome To Topix Too Forum

You have people like Joanna who believe in killing an unborn child is a 'right', but rages against somebody who abuses an animal/child.  You can't make this level of insanity up. I tried to tell her, draw pictures and sent a video link on how children are made, and that if "pro-choice" people don't want kids they should stop doing the very ONE thing causing it. I don't think it has sunk in yet....

But as we see, it isn't about really having a 'choice' cause 'my body', it's really about not wanting to pay the consequences for our actions.

If your freedom of choice isn't under threat do you really think your views have any merit?, its not like I advocate killing of unborn kids but shit happens as they say and who am I to pass judgment on someone who makes a choice I don't necessarily think is right, consequences of a persons actions generally fall upon the person committing those actions, not so funny when your freedom of choice is on the line




Funny.

You didn't seem to have a problem with those self entitled Gays when they sued and tried to force the christian baker to bake them a wedding cake.  Weird. Luckily the Supreme Court understands that somebody else's right to be gay stops when it infringes on someone else's right to practice their religion.. Just like I'm more than sure you want somebody else's religion to stop when it infringes on their right to be gay.  This is how our republic is suppose to work.  Can you imagine the tears that you would shed if that christian baker sued to make that gay (man) marry a woman!!!!!   

"I do not hate white, Christian males, males, or whites " - J50
"If I were to be a killer it would be of white, Christian males, those I would feed to lions" -J50
One of these thing isn't quite like the other. Hmmm. And No I didn't start that "Joanna's the killer', I just have a good enough memory to remember it being said.


You didn't see racism on the discovery channel? Are you being serious right now?   First off, like the History Channel, The Discovery Channel has pretty much lost all it's credibility of being an actual educational program. Second, the Discovery Channel don't show a lot of things, so saying it doesn't exist just because some TV show doesn't acknowledge it is absolutely preposterous.


To answer your question on Adam and Eve. I said "Biblically speaking", so in no way did I make that claim. I'm stating from the biblical view point that it says Adam and Eve. Eve was the mother of all man. I'd recall the verses, but since you think it's just "fairytales", I'd just be wasting my time.

The Bible don't tell us a lot of things in great detail, (Like Discovery Channel) but there is no time frame given between Cain,  Abel, Seth and their wives. Since Cain went and dwelt within the city of Nod with his wife after killing Abel, one can assume a great amount of time had passed. Since the Bible is told in a (evil) Patriarchal fashion, I'm not really surprised "faceless" women are not mentioned.

To the incest question. You're not the first one to ask this. I've asked this along with a great many others. I'd have to look it up, but I don't think we should view history through a modern lens. I do believe it was in Leviticus that God condemned sexual relations of close relatives. And such relations was then considered incest. Sorry I can't answer this one more thoroughly. Maybe somebody on here is a Biblical Scholar and chime in.




 Also, try reading the Bible once in your lifetime instead of misquoting it and failing to understand what it says. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.

EDIT: Added another reply.


If you think Animals are incapable of rational and logical thought, you need to get outside more often.