No, there are postulations - not scientific 'theories'. Learn the actual definition of scientific theory.
In addition, educate yourself on the difference twixt possibility and probability. Many concepts might be within the realm of possibility but not probable. Read the suppositions postulated for faster than light travel.
As for the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you have always been a prime example.
Now go play with your conspiracy 'theories', Mr. 'Attorney'.
Semantics. At least call me a conspiracy postulationist, and be consistent.
Is he a conspiracy theorist? Is he a quack? As he said, why is our military and government, including the FBI and many government agencies, asking people like for him explaining these things. He said the best is yet to come too.
There is nothing in the theory of relativity that prevents faster than light travel if you expand and contract space time. Hubbles Law already tells us that two universes at opposite ends of the universe are moving away from each other faster than light. We also know space time expanded much faster during cosmic inflation. So, it's possible for the universe to do this and object to travel away from each other at speeds faster than light. In terms of contraction, the Big Crunch is a theory. Whether it's possible for us to so in a way that would allow faster than light travel, is a totally different question, but there is nothing in physics that says this would violate the laws of physics.
Home
Chat
Login
Register