Author Topic: : Does Our Media Work For The People 4 ?---------------  (Read 118371 times)

Garthok and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

Solstice

  • Guest
NOT psychosis you stupid FK!

Offline

  • Administrator
  • 200 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 322016
  • Reputation: +580/-91
  • "A countenance more in sorrow than in anger"
  • Location: Topix Too
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
According to a new study, something was observing nuclear tests from space before the satellite era.

An international team of scientists led by astrophysicist Beatriz Villaruel of the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics published a discovery in Scientific Reports.

After analyzing more than 100,000 astronomical photographs taken between 1949 and 1957, researchers identified a series of anomalous flashes of light known as transients. These points of light appeared to suddenly appear, rotate and disappear.

The study revealed that the frequency of these phenomena increased by 45% during the days surrounding the first atmospheric nuclear detonations. The flashes displayed a highly reflective, mirror-like glow, and some displayed apparent rotation.

Most notably, all the images analyzed predate 1957, the year humans placed their first satellite into orbit. The team ruled out natural causes and optical failures, noting that if the recordings are authentic, the objects would have to be non-human artificial structures.

*** just another quack astrophysicist.
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.
Informative Informative x 1 View List

Solstice

  • Guest
No matter what screen names you keep using, you are the dumbest MFKr I've come across in more than three decades on the internet.

Solstice

  • Guest
*** just another quack astrophysicist.

Yup!  Just look her up, stupid.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
I am sure I am not the only screen name that makes you look foolish; so,you probably have me confused with many people under different names that make you look stupid, but I only use one screen name, dumb-dumb. 

When everybody dunks on you, everybody is Jordan.

😊
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Solstice

  • Guest

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
Yup!  Just look her up, stupid.

Data show that unidentified lights in archival astronomy images were 68% more likely to be imaged 24 hours after a nuclear weapons test.
Space · space.com


She's not the only person who thinks this.  There is evidence that we have no idea what certain observational phenomenon are.

We also have the government studying this for 80 years.  Why would it take 80 years and we still haven't figured out that it's all just balloons?  How do you explain this and the other things I have asked you repeatedly?
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Solstice

  • Guest
The Pentagon UFO Report, is a United States federally mandated assessment summarizing information regarding unidentified flying objects (UFOs), also known as unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAPs). On June 25, 2021, a nine-page preliminary assessment was issued. It states that the UAPTF (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force) focused on 144 observations of "unidentified aerial phenomena" by the U.S Armed Forces, mostly from U.S. Navy personnel, from 2004 to 2021. No details are given in the preliminary assessment. The report found that the UAPTF was unable to identify 143 of these objects, but it included five categories of potential explanations; "Airborne Clutter" includes objects like birds and balloons, "Natural Atmospheric Phenomena" includes atmospheric effect like ice crystals, "USG or Industry Developmental Programs" includes US military technology, "Foreign Adversary Systems" includes technologies developed by foreign governments such as Russia or China, and "Other", described as a "catchall" for other explanations.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
You are a liar.

Sublime and NC Yankee are all I have used, and everyone knows I am Sublime. 

What's the point of posting as a regular if you are changing your screen name all the time?  No one isninterested in keeping a notebook to keep track of screen names.
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Solstice

  • Guest
She's not the only person who thinks this.

So what?

Solstice

  • Guest
Sublime and NC Yankee are all I have used

You are a liar.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
The Pentagon UFO Report, is a United States federally mandated assessment summarizing information regarding unidentified flying objects (UFOs), also known as unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAPs). On June 25, 2021, a nine-page preliminary assessment was issued. It states that the UAPTF (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force) focused on 144 observations of "unidentified aerial phenomena" by the U.S Armed Forces, mostly from U.S. Navy personnel, from 2004 to 2021. No details are given in the preliminary assessment. The report found that the UAPTF was unable to identify 143 of these objects, but it included five categories of potential explanations; "Airborne Clutter" includes objects like birds and balloons, "Natural Atmospheric Phenomena" includes atmospheric effect like ice crystals, "USG or Industry Developmental Programs" includes US military technology, "Foreign Adversary Systems" includes technologies developed by foreign governments such as Russia or China, and "Other", described as a "catchall" for other explanations.

Why is the pentagon even looking at this, if it's so ridiculous?  Why have they been doing it for 80 years?
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
You are a liar.

Why don't you spill the beans and share all my supposed screen names?
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
Why are you posting in bold and red?  Calm down now.
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
Is it supposed to carry more weight, if you make it bold and red?  Are you like, "I'll really show that mo fo'er how wrong he is by posting in bold red font!"

😂

You got me.  You win.  I have no response to your choice of font.
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Offline

  • 25 Grand Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53454
  • Reputation: +271/-315
NOT psychosis you stupid FK!

It started with bold, then she got even more mad and made it red too, lmao.  She's like my lil windup toy.  Lmao
The days go by slow, but the years go by fast.

Solstice

  • Guest
No one isninterested in keeping a notebook to keep track of screen names.

That is a total falsehood.  I've come across numerous people online who have admitted to exactly that.

One of the most infamous went under the screen name of Cookie Parker and over 300 more screen names she kept in a notebook complete with background stories.

She was - and probably still is - involved here.

This place operates like every forum she has run or been involved with.

 

Topix Too