Welcome To Topix Too Forum
General Chat And Non Game Boards => Current Events => Topic started by: purplelady1040 on March 16, 2019, 10:59:47 am
-
I don't care what one's religious beliefs are but bombing any place whether church or a movie theater is a coward's way of doing things. I have said maybe we need to do like some courthouses and federal buildings and start having everyone go through metal detectors. It won't stop bombings or shootings but it would be a start.
-
I don't care what one's religious beliefs are but bombing any place whether church or a movie theater is a coward's way of doing things. I have said maybe we need to do like some courthouses and federal buildings and start having everyone go through metal detectors. It won't stop bombings or shootings but it would be a start.
What he did was the exact opposite of the definition of "coward", to be honest.
We live in a world where if you (mostly whitey) don't lay down and play dead, your labeled and any legitimate concern is dismissively brushed under the rug because you're a "racist".
Maybe this is the only option this man felt he had left. And to steal a phrase from the liberal media, it looks like he "found his voice".
People are finally listening- for now.
-
What he did was the exact opposite of the definition of "coward", to be honest.
We live in a world where if you (mostly whitey) don't lay down and play dead, your labeled and any legitimate concern is dismissively brushed under the rug because you're a "racist".
Maybe this is the only option this man felt he had left. And to steal a phrase from the liberal media, it looks like he "found his voice".
People are finally listening- for now.
No, any time you take someone's life, one is a coward. I don't care the means of how it is done but it is being a coward.
-
No, any time you take someone's life, one is a coward. I don't care the means of how it is done but it is being a coward.
Good job calling people in the US Military and Law enforcement a "coward", or even civilians who defended themselves/others from bodily harm.
I'm going to assume you don't find people who have abortions a "coward"? OH, that's right, that's somehow different.
But thanks for proving my point on how dismissive people are. Totally unconcerned about "why" this man did what he did, but more focused on "what".
-
Good job calling people in the US Military and Law enforcement a "coward", or even civilians who defended themselves/others from bodily harm.
I'm going to assume you don't find people who have abortions a "coward"? OH, that's right, that's somehow different.
But thanks for proving my point on how dismissive people are. Totally unconcerned about "why" this man did what he did, but more focused on "what".
Nope law enforcement and military are not cowards at all. I support them wholeheartedly and back them but a coward who takes someone life like this guy did and like others who murder people for no justified reasons are the cowards. By the way, a person who is defending themselves isn't a coward either but taking someone's life for no reason is being a coward. I don't believe in abortion but that is my personal belief. I really wish you could comprehend what people write but you seem to have a hard time of that. As I posted I don't believe in using churches to make points and security needs to be done in almost all places these days either by checking bags and using metal detectors but even then killings will happen. If you don't get that from the point I was suggesting than you really need some comprehension skills.
This shooter seems to be part of a white supremacist group who decided to kill someone just because they were different from him whether religion or race which shows he was and is a coward.
-
Nope law enforcement and military are not cowards at all. I support them wholeheartedly and back them but a coward who takes someone life like this guy did and like others who murder people for no justified reasons are the cowards. By the way, a person who is defending themselves isn't a coward either but taking someone's life for no reason is being a coward. I don't believe in abortion but that is my personal belief. I really wish you could comprehend what people write but you seem to have a hard time of that. As I posted I don't believe in using churches to make points and security needs to be done in almost all places these days either by checking bags and using metal detectors but even then killings will happen. If you don't get that from the point I was suggesting than you really need some comprehension skills.
First, if you want me to "comprehend" what you're saying, then maybe you should actually write out what you mean instead of sending mixed messages.
You said "No, ANY TIME you take someone's life, one is a coward." (added emphases on any time)
Then you backtrack saying they're are actual caveats to this statement.
Here we are again. You are claiming from your own personal view he had "no legitimate reason" to kill these people. Still totally dismissing HIS concerns. How are we expect to address "why" this happens if you refuse to even acknowledge HIS possible legitimate reasons by dismissively calling him a coward? Metal detectors are a band-aid solution to the effects of the problem, a problem people refuse to have an open discussion about.
As an example. Look at this article totally denouncing this Australian senator for even bringing up that maybe immigration might be the cause. Same people who are denouncing this "racist" violent act, are the same ones starting gofundme accounts for people who are violently assaulting others as seen with the kid in this article. Hypocrisy as it's finest.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/australian-senator-criticized-for-blaming-muslim-immigration-for-shootings-punches-teen-after-hes-egged/ar-BBUQMWz?ocid=chromentp
-
First, if you want me to "comprehend" what you're saying, then maybe you should actually write out what you mean instead of sending mixed messages.
You said "No, ANY TIME you take someone's life, one is a coward." (added emphases on any time)
Then you backtrack saying they're are actual caveats to this statement.
Here we are again. You are claiming from your own personal view he had "no legitimate reason" to kill these people. Still totally dismissing HIS concerns. How are we expect to address "why" this happens if you refuse to even acknowledge HIS possible legitimate reasons by dismissively calling him a coward? Metal detectors are a band-aid solution to the effects of the problem, a problem people refuse to have an open discussion about.
As an example. Look at this article totally denouncing this Australian senator for even bringing up that maybe immigration might be the cause. Same people who are denouncing this "racist" violent act, are the same ones starting gofundme accounts for people who are violently assaulting others as seen with the kid in this article. Hypocrisy as it's finest.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/australian-senator-criticized-for-blaming-muslim-immigration-for-shootings-punches-teen-after-hes-egged/ar-BBUQMWz?ocid=chromentp
If you would bother to read what I posted I said that checking bags and metal detectors would not always prevent all killings but it would help. Is that hard for you to understand? No, no caveat to what I stated except as always you try to make a mountain out of a molehill where there is none. The guy is a coward just like anyone who belongs to groups like that. Now you can continue showing us all how you think what he did was right, I don't. All you have shown us all is that you believe murdering someone who is in their church of worship or just minding their business is right. You are no different it seems than a white police officer who kills a black person who is unarmed and doing nothing but they abuse their power. Oh but that is okay for you, isn't it?
-
If you would bother to read what I posted I said that checking bags and metal detectors would not always prevent all killings but it would help. Is that hard for you to understand? No, no caveat to what I stated except as always you try to make a mountain out of a molehill where there is none. The guy is a coward just like anyone who belongs to groups like that. Now you can continue showing us all how you think what he did was right, I don't. All you have shown us all is that you believe murdering someone who is in their church of worship or just minding their business is right. You are no different it seems than a white police officer who kills a black person who is unarmed and doing nothing but they abuse their power. Oh but that is okay for you, isn't it?
Ah, I see you subscribe to the Saul Alinsky school of thought on how to debate.
Can you please point out where I said anything that contradicted you on metal detectors? My statement was more on addressing that the issue causing the need for those isn't being addressed. I clearly stated this. Even provided a link showing that anyone bringing it up is immediately ostracized and attacked.
If you stated "any time" somebody kills somebody they're a "coward", then walk back that statement later with "unless they kill doing this, then they're not a coward", that is the very definition of a caveat. Are you actually going to straight face deny you said this when it's there in black and white for everyone to read?
Can you please point out where I said/shown he was right in doing what he did? Saying this man "may" of had legitimate reasons is not the same as saying I personally believe he was right in carrying out actions stemming from those reasons. HUGE difference.
I like how you continue to prove my point on how dismissive people are soon as they're labeled a (how did the media put it) "RACIST RIGHT-WING, WHITE NATIONAL TERRORIST"
Because somehow in the brainwashed masses mind, this spells out "automatically wrong with no possible legitimate concerns".
-
Ah, I see you subscribe to the Saul Alinsky school of thought on how to debate.
Can you please point out where I said anything that contradicted you on metal detectors? My statement was more on addressing that the issue causing the need for those isn't being addressed. I clearly stated this. Even provided a link showing that anyone bringing it up is immediately ostracized and attacked.
If you stated "any time" somebody kills somebody they're a "coward", then walk back that statement later with "unless they kill doing this, then they're not a coward", that is the very definition of a caveat. Are you actually going to straight face deny you said this when it's there in black and white for everyone to read?
Can you please point out where I said/shown he was right in doing what he did? Saying this man "may" of had legitimate reasons is not the same as saying I personally believe he was right in carrying out actions stemming from those reasons. HUGE difference.
I like how you continue to prove my point on how dismissive people are soon as they're labeled a (how did the media put it) "RACIST RIGHT-WING, WHITE NATIONAL TERRORIST"
Because somehow in the brainwashed masses mind, this spells out "automatically wrong with no possible legitimate concerns".
No, but for you to think mass killings are acceptable tells me that there is definitely something wrong with you and your thinking. You show it every time. You have this time and you will again.
-
No, but for you to think mass killings are acceptable tells me that there is definitely something wrong with you and your thinking. You show it every time. You have this time and you will again.
WLU just enjoys playing Devil's advocate. I doubt that he actually believes that killing innocent people is somehow righteous. He'll protest this, of course, but he's really not a bad guy.
-
WLU just enjoys playing Devil's advocate. I doubt that he actually believes that killing innocent people is somehow righteous. He'll protest this, of course, but he's really not a bad guy.
He seems to believe that him being white makes him supreme and it doesn't nor does his thinking make him better than anyone else. No one is.
-
WLU just enjoys playing Devil's advocate. I doubt that he actually believes that killing innocent people is somehow righteous. He'll protest this, of course, but he's really not a bad guy.
My sweet, sweet Der. Don't ruin all my fun. DAMMIT !
You know I consider the battling of wits to be better than sex, war and strawberry milkshakes combined! - It's the ultimate human endeavor.
God, you're such an "orgasm" denier.
All jokes aside,
I'm still wondering how she came to that conclusion.
Stating someone "may" have a legitimate concern isn't the same as saying I agree on how he acted over those possible legitimate concerns.
But like everyone else, nobody wants to discuss the possible reasons. However, they sure do like to sit around using labels to dismissively ignore the issue.
I've searched around, does anyone have a a link to his 74 page manifesto? I figured it would of leaked by now. I'd like to read it to make a more informed opinion of the situation.
He seems to believe that him being white makes him supreme and it doesn't nor does his thinking make him better than anyone else. No one is.
Well, people (liberals) keep repeating that sentiment. So, why not have some fun with it.
-
My sweet, sweet Der. Don't ruin all my fun. DAMMIT !
You know I consider the battling of wits to be better than sex, war and strawberry milkshakes combined! - It's the ultimate human endeavor.
God, you're such an "orgasm" denier.
All jokes aside,
I'm still wondering how she came to that conclusion.
Stating someone "may" have a legitimate concern isn't the same as saying I agree on how he acted over those possible legitimate concerns.
But like everyone else, nobody wants to discuss the possible reasons. However, they sure do like to sit around using labels to dismissively ignore the issue.
I've searched around, does anyone have a a link to his 74 page manifesto? I figured it would of leaked by now. I'd like to read it to make a more informed opinion of the situation.
Well, people (liberals) keep repeating that sentiment. So, why not have some fun with it.
I am sure you can google his manifesto if you so desire. But you are the one who seems to think a mass killing is quite okay.
-
My sweet, sweet Der. Don't ruin all my fun. DAMMIT !
You know I consider the battling of wits to be better than sex, war and strawberry milkshakes combined! - It's the ultimate human endeavor.
God, you're such an "orgasm" denier.
All jokes aside,
I'm still wondering how she came to that conclusion.
Stating someone "may" have a legitimate concern isn't the same as saying I agree on how he acted over those possible legitimate concerns.
But like everyone else, nobody wants to discuss the possible reasons. However, they sure do like to sit around using labels to dismissively ignore the issue.
I've searched around, does anyone have a a link to his 74 page manifesto? I figured it would of leaked by now. I'd like to read it to make a more informed opinion of the situation.
Well, people (liberals) keep repeating that sentiment. So, why not have some fun with it.
I think his reasons for doing what he did is just like anyones else's he felt justified in doing what he did, and unless his reasons can change the outcome does it matter what they are
-
https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Replacementconvertito.pdf
Here is the NZ shooter manifesto if anyone cares to read it. For those who think it's too long of a read here is a quick summary.
Basically, he considers himself Ethno-nationalist, Eco-fascist that is engaging in lawful warfare as a uniformed partisan against people he refers to as "invaders of the west". See's white people being replaced in their "home" countries due to low fertility rates. Doesn't "hate" those of another race, culture, ethnic background long as they don't "invade" and replace the established racial and cultural demographics. Wants to spark a debate in the media and political forum along the issue's of racial, cultural replacement and gun rights. See's himself maybe ushering in the balkanization of the US along racial and cultural lines due to his actions. Loathes modern day conservatives as weak, unable to stand up to defend themselves or their people.
That pretty much sums up his thought, IMHO.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also manage to to watch the video of the killings. In his manifesto he claims to of had no help from outside forces like the CIA, Massad etc etc. Not to get into tinfoil hat theories, but there are parts of the video that you get the strange sense this shooter has some "ESP" (extra sensory perception) happening or someone is feeding him info. As if he is being told where people are running out from, places they are. mostly when he runs around outside the building. Then again, that could just be explained away by training and bad luck.
If anyone wants to see a 15 min clip of the killings, take yourself on over to livegore(dot)com. Graphic content disclaimer. Truthfully, nothing happens in the video that shines any more light or reasons to "why" this person did what he did than what is already stated in his manifesto. And advise those with weak constitutions to stay clear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Replacementconvertito.pdf
Here is the NZ shooter manifesto if anyone cares to read it. For those who think it's too long of a read here is a quick summary.
Basically, he considers himself Ethno-nationalist, Eco-fascist that is engaging in lawful warfare as a uniformed partisan against people he refers to as "invaders of the west". See's white people being replaced in their "home" countries due to low fertility rates. Doesn't "hate" those of another race, culture, ethnic background long as they don't "invade" and replace the established racial and cultural demographics. Wants to spark a debate in the media and political forum along the issue's of racial, cultural replacement and gun rights. See's himself maybe ushering in the balkanization of the US along racial and cultural lines due to his actions. Loathes modern day conservatives as weak, unable to stand up to defend themselves or their people.
That pretty much sums up his thought, IMHO.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also manage to to watch the video of the killings. In his manifesto he claims to of had no help from outside forces like the CIA, Massad etc etc. Not to get into tinfoil hat theories, but there are parts of the video that you get the strange sense this shooter has some "ESP" (extra sensory perception) happening or someone is feeding him info. As if he is being told where people are running out from, places they are. mostly when he runs around outside the building. Then again, that could just be explained away by training and bad luck.
If anyone wants to see a 15 min clip of the killings, take yourself on over to livegore(dot)com. Graphic content disclaimer. Truthfully, nothing happens in the video that shines any more light or reasons to "why" this person did what he did than what is already stated in his manifesto. And advise those with weak constitutions to stay clear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So he did feel justified in his actions, btw who is Saul Alinsky?
-
Stochastic terrorism...
It's not a new term but an old one__obviously you're not well versed on the subject of terrorism.
-
So he did feel justified in his actions, btw who is Saul Alinsky?
He is someone the rich right wingers hate and gets the trailer park conservative to foam at the mouth in faux hatred for, like that Soros guy, boogeymen, not really important in the overall scheme of things. They gotta be told who to hate...
-
He is someone the rich right wingers hate and gets the trailer park conservative to foam at the mouth in faux hatred for, like that Soros guy, boogeymen, not really important in the overall scheme of things. They gotta be told who to hate...
I see so just another garden variety sheep
-
I see so just another garden variety sheep
Yes. He hears it from a rich and pampered conservative commentator in his/her air conditioned environment and then echoes it here. Those are not well known names among the common people they use and is rarely newsworthy...
-
I see so just another garden variety sheep
Also Alinsky has been dead since 1972, kinda like Trump bashing McCain except McCain is more current but no difference...
-
Stochastic terrorism...
It's not a new term but an old one__obviously you're not well versed on the subject of terrorism.
Hello Realtime.
Just in case this was directed at me for my comment. I understand what Stochastic terrorism is. Just because you misinterpreted my comment doesn't mean "obviously you're not well versed on the subject of terrorism". That's an awful huge leap in logic, don't you think?
I don't doubt the abilities of a trained and highly motivate individual. In no way was I trying to imply he wasn't alone, hence my comment that his training and just bad luck could explain the oddity of him seemingly understanding where people were to shoot outside the building. I'm without a doubt he knew where all the exits were and the layout of the complex. I think he stated in his manifesto he planned the attack for 3 months on that location.
Yes. He hears it from a rich and pampered conservative commentator in his/her air conditioned environment and then echoes it here. Those are not well known names among the common people they use and is rarely newsworthy...
Weepy, I say this without malice. But it's disgraceful that you relegated yourself into being nothing more than a sideshow distraction.
After two weeks have gone by, I understand now the demeaning and great intellectual devastation I must of inflicted after I slammed you pretty hard in front of everybody. Socially, it was probably embarrassing as well for you, an egregious degrading wounding to your pride. Sometimes, I forget that there is someone, an actual human-being sitting on the other end of the screen who's feelings could be easily hurt. For that, I apologize. I also understand the nature of your need for vengeance by making such lighthearted playful quips at my expense. However, I do enjoy them. A sort of Quid Pro Quo to save face in front of everyone and regain your sense of dignity from your self exiled, shameful position.
Sympathetic for your need to recoup emotionally and physically. I'll steer clear until you signal you are ready to discuss subject matter in a more scholarly approach. I would really like to hear your views on these sociocultural phenomenon. With that said, the most important thing now is for you to heal. I just wanted to let you know I am here for you little buddy.
Love, WLU
-
Hello Realtime.
Just in case this was directed at me for my comment. I understand what Stochastic terrorism is. Just because you misinterpreted my comment doesn't mean "obviously you're not well versed on the subject of terrorism". That's an awful huge leap in logic, don't you think?
I don't doubt the abilities of a trained and highly motivate individual. In no way was I trying to imply he wasn't alone, hence my comment that his training and just bad luck could explain the oddity of him seemingly understanding where people were to shoot outside the building. I'm without a doubt he knew where all the exits were and the layout of the complex. I think he stated in his manifesto he planned the attack for 3 months on that location.
Weepy, I say this without malice. But it's disgraceful that you relegated yourself into being nothing more than a sideshow distraction.
After two weeks have gone by, I understand now the demeaning and great intellectual devastation I must of inflicted after I slammed you pretty hard in front of everybody. Socially, it was probably embarrassing as well for you, an egregious degrading wounding to your pride. Sometimes, I forget that there is someone, an actual human-being sitting on the other end of the screen who's feelings could be easily hurt. For that, I apologize. I also understand the nature of your need for vengeance by making such lighthearted playful quips at my expense. However, I do enjoy them. A sort of Quid Pro Quo to save face in front of everyone and regain your sense of dignity from your self exiled, shameful position.
Sympathetic for your need to recoup emotionally and physically. I'll steer clear until you signal you are ready to discuss subject matter in a more scholarly approach. I would really like to hear your views on these sociocultural phenomenon. With that said, the most important thing now is for you to heal. I just wanted to let you know I am here for you little buddy.
Love, WLU
Nice comedy schtick there but that drivel is a rerun as well. when you are not repeating what some hot air balloon like RxUSH Limbaugh says, you go to plagiarizing Wile E Coyote ( a cartoon for crying out loud) under the guise of a "comeback" while using obvious indignation to make your point. You have no original bone in your body. I have smacked better material than that. But nice try..
-
Nice comedy schtick there but that drivel is a rerun as well. when you are not repeating what some hot air balloon like RxUSH Limbaugh says, you go to plagiarizing Wile E Coyote ( a cartoon for crying out loud) under the guise of a "comeback" while using obvious indignation to make your point. You have no original bone in your body. I have smacked better material than that. But nice try..
I find it heartbreaking that is how you received my genuine concern. However, I understand now that voicing it in public maybe wasn't the best way to go about it. I have worked with, and even hired, trouble young adults before and you gave the impression like you needed some empathy and recourse to your perceived slight after all the signs you've displayed to my "affront" to your reputation. I know how important reputation is to younger kids as a status of their "manhood".
I also notice you nonchalantly admitted to using drugs by how you phrased "smacked" in your reply.. "Smacked" is slang for getting a really good "hit" off of a narcotic substance, usually marijuana. Medically, marijuana is used to treat people with anger issue's that lack normal, gated emotional controls. Example: Your (continued) inappropriate anger response relative to the situation.
However, with the level of outburst leaning to the extreme that you displayed a few weeks ago and the stalking behavior you're starting to display by following me around the forums trying to get in a proverbial "jab" is worrying that you might be having an adverse reaction to the marijuana, or god forbid, on something more dangerous. Marijuana has been known to cause reaction in some people to have the reverse soothing effect that most people enjoy by raising your heart rate, anxiety, paranoia and mood alterations.
If you haven't been prescribed this drug for treatment or have become addicted. I know of a couple people in here that work with troubled adults/youth who have drug addictions and emotional developmental problems. I also implore you to think of how your unresolved, drug infused anger may effect the loved ones around you -your wife/husband and kids. It only takes a split second to lose control and cause irrevocable emotional and/or physical damage to them that you might spend a lifetime regretting.
National Drug Hotline: 1-888-633-3239
Suicide prevention: 1-800-273-8255
Domestic Abuse Hotline: 1-800-799-7233
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on an earlier relative post.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/teen-who-threw-egg-at-australian-lawmaker-to-donate-gofundme-money-for-more-eggs-to-mosque-shooting-victims/ar-BBUWcHk
$55,000 now raised to pay the legal fee's of the attacker who assaulted an Australian Senator over his comments about the NZ shooter and immigration.
I'll reiterate what I have said before. People are still asking "why" the NZ shooter did what he did. But are doing the very thing that help perpetuate his actions by assaulting, silencing and ostracize anyone wanting to have a meaningful discussion about immigration.
Even the media is now dangerously spinning this unlawful attack on the senator as a "feel good" story, shining the attacker's actions as a legitimate "hero of the people" and for donating his ill-gotten cash.
The NZ attacker should be accountable for his action. But as shown in the article above, we need to understand that his actions were cultivated from a hostile environment in which he felt he no longer had a voice.
-
I find it heartbreaking that is how you received my genuine concern. However, I understand now that voicing it in public maybe wasn't the best way to go about it. I have worked with, and even hired, trouble young adults before and you gave the impression like you needed some empathy and recourse to your perceived slight after all the signs you've displayed to my "affront" to your reputation. I know how important reputation is to younger kids as a status of their "manhood".
I also notice you nonchalantly admitted to using drugs by how you phrased "smacked" in your reply.. "Smacked" is slang for getting a really good "hit" off of a narcotic substance, usually marijuana. Medically, marijuana is used to treat people with anger issue's that lack normal, gated emotional controls. Example: Your (continued) inappropriate anger response relative to the situation.
However, with the level of outburst leaning to the extreme that you displayed a few weeks ago and the stalking behavior you're starting to display by following me around the forums trying to get in a proverbial "jab" is worrying that you might be having an adverse reaction to the marijuana, or god forbid, on something more dangerous. Marijuana has been known to cause reaction in some people to have the reverse soothing effect that most people enjoy by raising your heart rate, anxiety, paranoia and mood alterations.
If you haven't been prescribed this drug for treatment or have become addicted. I know of a couple people in here that work with troubled adults/youth who have drug addictions and emotional developmental problems. I also implore you to think of how your unresolved, drug infused anger may effect the loved ones around you -your wife/husband and kids. It only takes a split second to lose control and cause irrevocable emotional and/or physical damage to them that you might spend a lifetime regretting.
National Drug Hotline: 1-888-633-3239
Suicide prevention: 1-800-273-8255
Domestic Abuse Hotline: 1-800-799-7233
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on an earlier relative post.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/teen-who-threw-egg-at-australian-lawmaker-to-donate-gofundme-money-for-more-eggs-to-mosque-shooting-victims/ar-BBUWcHk
$55,000 now raised to pay the legal fee's of the attacker who assaulted an Australian Senator over his comments about the NZ shooter and immigration.
I'll reiterate what I have said before. People are still asking "why" the NZ shooter did what he did. But are doing the very thing that help perpetuate his actions by assaulting, silencing and ostracize anyone wanting to have a meaningful discussion about immigration.
Even the media is now dangerously spinning this unlawful attack on the senator as a "feel good" story, shining the attacker's actions as a legitimate "hero of the people" and for donating his ill-gotten cash.
The NZ attacker should be accountable for his action. But as shown in the article above, we need to understand that his actions were cultivated from a hostile environment in which he felt he no longer had a voice.
First off in reference to the first part of your post thanks for info on the def of smacked as that is something I didn't know, secondly medical marijuana is not prescribed for anger issues. Now in reference to the update I call bullshit as this dude let his misinformation fuel his fear and his sense of entitlement not cultivated from a hostile environment unless its one of his own cultivation. And in order to have any meaningful discussion on anything one must remove emotionality from the equation and rely on logic and reasoning
-
I find it heartbreaking that is how you received my genuine concern. However, I understand now that voicing it in public maybe wasn't the best way to go about it. I have worked with, and even hired, trouble young adults before and you gave the impression like you needed some empathy and recourse to your perceived slight after all the signs you've displayed to my "affront" to your reputation. I know how important reputation is to younger kids as a status of their "manhood".
I also notice you nonchalantly admitted to using drugs by how you phrased "smacked" in your reply.. "Smacked" is slang for getting a really good "hit" off of a narcotic substance, usually marijuana. Medically, marijuana is used to treat people with anger issue's that lack normal, gated emotional controls. Example: Your (continued) inappropriate anger response relative to the situation.
However, with the level of outburst leaning to the extreme that you displayed a few weeks ago and the stalking behavior you're starting to display by following me around the forums trying to get in a proverbial "jab" is worrying that you might be having an adverse reaction to the marijuana, or god forbid, on something more dangerous. Marijuana has been known to cause reaction in some people to have the reverse soothing effect that most people enjoy by raising your heart rate, anxiety, paranoia and mood alterations.
If you haven't been prescribed this drug for treatment or have become addicted. I know of a couple people in here that work with troubled adults/youth who have drug addictions and emotional developmental problems. I also implore you to think of how your unresolved, drug infused anger may effect the loved ones around you -your wife/husband and kids. It only takes a split second to lose control and cause irrevocable emotional and/or physical damage to them that you might spend a lifetime regretting.
National Drug Hotline: 1-888-633-3239
Suicide prevention: 1-800-273-8255
Domestic Abuse Hotline: 1-800-799-7233
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on an earlier relative post.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/teen-who-threw-egg-at-australian-lawmaker-to-donate-gofundme-money-for-more-eggs-to-mosque-shooting-victims/ar-BBUWcHk
$55,000 now raised to pay the legal fee's of the attacker who assaulted an Australian Senator over his comments about the NZ shooter and immigration.
I'll reiterate what I have said before. People are still asking "why" the NZ shooter did what he did. But are doing the very thing that help perpetuate his actions by assaulting, silencing and ostracize anyone wanting to have a meaningful discussion about immigration.
Even the media is now dangerously spinning this unlawful attack on the senator as a "feel good" story, shining the attacker's actions as a legitimate "hero of the people" and for donating his ill-gotten cash.
The NZ attacker should be accountable for his action. But as shown in the article above, we need to understand that his actions were cultivated from a hostile environment in which he felt he no longer had a voice.
Just because someone posts smack in posts doesn't by any shape, form or fashion mean that they use drugs. That is a real stretch of the imagination. You know just because someone uses that term doesn't mean that and you are continuing to make an ass out of yourself assuming that.
-
First off in reference to the first part of your post thanks for info on the def of smacked as that is something I didn't know, secondly medical marijuana is not prescribed for anger issues. Now in reference to the update I call bullshat as this dude let his misinformation fuel his fear and his sense of entitlement not cultivated from a hostile environment unless its one of his own cultivation. And in order to have any meaningful discussion on anything one must remove emotionality from the equation and rely on logic and reasoning
I think it is a stretch when someone assumes that someone is using drugs because they use the word smack in posts. Lol. I do know medical marijuana is used for a variety of things but not sure about anger issues, from what I have read it is used a lot by people suffering from cancer, chron's and glaucoma.
-
I think it is a stretch when someone assumes that someone is using drugs because they use the word smack in posts. Lol. I do know medical marijuana is used for a variety of things but not sure about anger issues, from what I have read it is used a lot by people suffering from cancer, chron's and glaucoma.
Perhaps in context is why that assumption was made, idk. I do know that pot has never been used at least not in a medical situation for anger issues, as anger issues are not a medical condition
-
I find it heartbreaking that is how you received my genuine concern. However, I understand now that voicing it in public maybe wasn't the best way to go about it. I have worked with, and even hired, trouble young adults before and you gave the impression like you needed some empathy and recourse to your perceived slight after all the signs you've displayed to my "affront" to your reputation. I know how important reputation is to younger kids as a status of their "manhood".
I also notice you nonchalantly admitted to using drugs by how you phrased "smacked" in your reply.. "Smacked" is slang for getting a really good "hit" off of a narcotic substance, usually marijuana. Medically, marijuana is used to treat people with anger issue's that lack normal, gated emotional controls. Example: Your (continued) inappropriate anger response relative to the situation.
However, with the level of outburst leaning to the extreme that you displayed a few weeks ago and the stalking behavior you're starting to display by following me around the forums trying to get in a proverbial "jab" is worrying that you might be having an adverse reaction to the marijuana, or god forbid, on something more dangerous. Marijuana has been known to cause reaction in some people to have the reverse soothing effect that most people enjoy by raising your heart rate, anxiety, paranoia and mood alterations.
If you haven't been prescribed this drug for treatment or have become addicted. I know of a couple people in here that work with troubled adults/youth who have drug addictions and emotional developmental problems. I also implore you to think of how your unresolved, drug infused anger may effect the loved ones around you -your wife/husband and kids. It only takes a split second to lose control and cause irrevocable emotional and/or physical damage to them that you might spend a lifetime regretting.
National Drug Hotline: 1-888-633-3239
Suicide prevention: 1-800-273-8255
Domestic Abuse Hotline: 1-800-799-7233
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on an earlier relative post.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/teen-who-threw-egg-at-australian-lawmaker-to-donate-gofundme-money-for-more-eggs-to-mosque-shooting-victims/ar-BBUWcHk
$55,000 now raised to pay the legal fee's of the attacker who assaulted an Australian Senator over his comments about the NZ shooter and immigration.
I'll reiterate what I have said before. People are still asking "why" the NZ shooter did what he did. But are doing the very thing that help perpetuate his actions by assaulting, silencing and ostracize anyone wanting to have a meaningful discussion about immigration.
Even the media is now dangerously spinning this unlawful attack on the senator as a "feel good" story, shining the attacker's actions as a legitimate "hero of the people" and for donating his ill-gotten cash.
The NZ attacker should be accountable for his action. But as shown in the article above, we need to understand that his actions were cultivated from a hostile environment in which he felt he no longer had a voice.
???
You are on a semantics trip, I am not much into such...
I see you are a fan of Egghead, if anyone needs a hit off a bong it would be him, he is violent and all he had was a shell cracked on his noggin and no pain whatsoever, the punishment did not fit the crime, the kid got the worst of it and needed medical attention, Egghead took a shower, took clothes to the cleaners, which he can easily afford and is back to normal in a lot less time. Your acceptance of anger filled bigotry is also noted with your support of Egghead.
You need to look in the mirror before casting those stones, Goober...
-
First off in reference to the first part of your post thanks for info on the def of smacked as that is something I didn't know, secondly medical marijuana is not prescribed for anger issues. Now in reference to the update I call bullshat as this dude let his misinformation fuel his fear and his sense of entitlement not cultivated from a hostile environment unless its one of his own cultivation. And in order to have any meaningful discussion on anything one must remove emotionality from the equation and rely on logic and reasoning
What "misinformation" is that which "fueled his fear and sense of entitlement"? Please, enlighten us.
Truthfully, after watching this unfold with the media, public and Australian premier siding with the person who attacked the Senator, while in the same breath condemning another attacker is the very pinnacle of hypocrisy and hostile environment.
Looking at this objectively, this shows me that it really isn't about the act of violence itself, but who's side is doing it.
I see you are a fan of Egghead, if anyone needs a hit off a bong it would be him, he is violent and all he had was a shell **** on his noggin and no pain whatsoever, the punishment did not fit the crime, the kid got the worst of it and needed medical attention, Egghead took a shower, took clothes to the cleaners, which he can easily afford and is back to normal in a lot less time.
I'm sorry, you lost me on this one Weepy.
I don't see how a villainous character (Egghead) from the 1960's Batman TV show that was played by Vincent Price has anything to do with what's being discussed.
Personally, I liked Cesar Romero's 'The Joker', it was in the order of magnitude better than Jim Carrey's version. And of course, the ever so lovely Anne Baxter as Olga. She was a stunningly beautiful woman and I think her portrayal of 'Nefretiri' in The 10 commandments was her greatest role.
Of course, she was 1 of a few childhood crushes, along with Yvonne De Carlo (Lily Munster - The Munsters -1960's) and Carolyn Jones (Morticia Addams- The Addams Family- 1960's).
Fun fact: Yvonne De Carlo that played Lily Munster on the Munster's was the wife (Sephora) of Moses, after his banishment from Egypt in The 10 Commandments.
If you want to finish discussing old TV shows, there is a thread already started. Here is the link.
https://texaspete.smfnew2.com/mike-teavee's-tv-land/
-
What "misinformation" is that which "fueled his fear and sense of entitlement"? Please, enlighten us.
Truthfully, after watching this unfold with the media, public and Australian premier siding with the person who attacked the Senator, while in the same breath condemning another attacker is the very pinnacle of hypocrisy and hostile environment.
Looking at this objectively, this shows me that it really isn't about the act of violence itself, but who's side is doing it.
I'm sorry, you lost me on this one Weepy.
I don't see how a villainous character (Egghead) from the 1960's Batman TV show that was played by Vincent Price has anything to do with what's being discussed.
Personally, I liked Cesar Romero's 'The Joker', it was in the order of magnitude better than Jim Carrey's version. And of course, the ever so lovely Anne Baxter as Olga. She was a stunningly beautiful woman and I think her portrayal of 'Nefretiri' in The 10 commandments was her greatest role.
Of course, she was 1 of a few childhood crushes, along with Yvonne De Carlo (Lily Munster - The Munsters -1960's) and Carolyn Jones (Morticia Addams- The Addams Family- 1960's).
Fun fact: Yvonne De Carlo that played Lily Munster on the Munster's was the wife (Sephora) of Moses, after his banishment from Egypt in The 10 Commandments.
If you want to finish discussing old TV shows, there is a thread already started. Here is the link.
https://texaspete.smfnew2.com/mike-teavee's-tv-land/
Ok I have a little time in a very busy day for me so I will tackle this drivel of yours..
Of course you are lost, you have already established that with your prior commentary on here, you are overstating the obvious and I expect you will be lost after You read this or pretend to, whatever..
Anyways you made a reference to the old Batman TV show which is an insult to the concept created by the late Bob Kane in the 1930's. That show was made into a parody because Batman and assorted villains are actually too violent for TV and was very true in the 1960s so they had to dumb it down so you would not cry to mommy because the violence scared you. Superman was violent as well and TV product was dumbed down.. The Munsters was a parody of Frankenstein and Dracula who were both violent characters not meant for children. That is irrelevant and why you decided to change the subject to avoid what was written by me I dunno, that is what your type does.
The Egghead character was a parody made for TV, the real Egghead , who you defend very passionately, is a senator over there and is violent and he assauts kids which was caught on tape in one instance. Why I dunno, I guess the kid was hungry and wanted to fix him an egg and the senator was such a hothead he thought his noggin was warm enough to cook on and was nearby and did not need to go home or to an Omelet shop and wanted to fix it himself. People do need food to survive you know and Egghead's noggin was nearby, cannot blame him...
You support Senator Egghead which means you endorse violence even to kids, while throwing that projection onto the actual victim, you should be ashamed..
You are comparing apples to oranges in your critique towards me and it was weak just like your other responses..
I will return later, when I need some entertainment I will seek your amateur commentary with the Wile E Coyote style, which I find funny...
-
Ok I have a little time in a very busy day for me so I will tackle this drivel of yours..
Of course you are lost, you have already established that with your prior commentary on here, you are overstating the obvious and I expect you will be lost after You read this or pretend to, whatever..
Anyways you made a reference to the old Batman TV show which is an insult to the concept created by the late Bob Kane in the 1930's. That show was made into a parody because Batman and assorted villains are actually too violent for TV and was very true in the 1960s so they had to dumb it down so you would not cry to mommy because the violence scared you. Superman was violent as well and TV product was dumbed down.. The Munsters was a parody of Frankenstein and Dracula who were both violent characters not meant for children. That is irrelevant and why you decided to change the subject to avoid what was written by me I dunno, that is what your type does.
The Egghead character was a parody made for TV, the real Egghead , who you defend very passionately, is a senator over there and is violent and he assauts kids which was caught on tape in one instance. Why I dunno, I guess the kid was hungry and wanted to fix him an egg and the senator was such a hothead he thought his noggin was warm enough to cook on and was nearby and did not need to go home or to an Omelet shop and wanted to fix it himself. People do need food to survive you know and Egghead's noggin was nearby, cannot blame him...
You support Senator Egghead which means you endorse violence even to kids, while throwing that projection onto the actual victim, you should be ashamed..
You are comparing apples to oranges in your critique towards me and it was weak just like your other responses..
I will return later, when I need some entertainment I will seek your amateur commentary with the Wile E Coyote style, which I find funny...
Uh-oh, look's like you're stuck on repeat.
Well, it look's like you reached the limits of your intellect in your ability for political debate and banter. While I do find it humorously deficient in anything original, the sub-par level of amatuerish persiflage is outstandingly bad- Bravo! I really hope this isn't the material that you've "smacked" better with, I'm going to be sadly disappointed if this is it. I truly am.
However, I'm just glad I was able to get (easily so) you to renege on your personal convictions that you think I'm "DQ'd" to converse with within a political nature. Thinking I was going to supply your narcissistic fuel, you engaged unwittingly when I directly challenged you. I yanked your chain and to your embarrassment, you danced like a puppet to my tune instead.
In your blind emotional rush to regain position after I have continually humiliated you in the political arena, your only recourse left was to engage in the banter one, as seen above. One in which you have also failed miserably as seen over the course of this conversation. The only thing you can mundanely muster repeatedly is; "Glen Beckkk", Faux News", Rxush", "Egghead" and "Wile E Coyote" - Ad Nauseum.
I have also noticed, and I'm sure others have by now, the only time you comment on political/social topic threads is to disrupt the hopefully objective information being discussed, with political rhetoric. We see this with your constant non-pertinent quips. My guess, since you seemingly lack any intelligent and/or relevant reply thus far, this is your only recourse to distract from it (hypocrisy, dangerous political polarization, unlawful dissent, ) being' brought to light' and discussed in any meaningful way.
Your modus operandi is no enigma to me.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS: It also looks like you are the type that feels the need to get the last word in to fulfill some sort of lacking interpersonal "need". Oddly, some people equate to getting in the last word to being correct in their position. Sort of like people yelling "racist" is some trump card that negates anything being said.
Being the understanding individual that I am (I let people have the last word in all the time because of this), I wasn't really being vicious (OK, maybe just a little) earlier when I mentioned I recognize your need to regain your sense of dignity. I even engaged you to give you ample opportunity, one which you sadly wasted laughably on outdated pop-culture references. With that said, and to return this thread on topic, I'm going to let you have at it. Don't disappoint.
Good luck next time and thanks for playing?!?!
-
Uh-oh, look's like you're stuck on repeat.
Well, it look's like you reached the limits of your intellect in your ability for political debate and banter. While I do find it humorously deficient in anything original, the sub-par level of amatuerish persiflage is outstandingly bad- Bravo! I really hope this isn't the material that you've "smacked" better with, I'm going to be sadly disappointed if this is it. I truly am.
However, I'm just glad I was able to get (easily so) you to renege on your personal convictions that you think I'm "DQ'd" to converse with within a political nature. Thinking I was going to supply your narcissistic fuel, you engaged unwittingly when I directly challenged you. I yanked your chain and to your embarrassment, you danced like a puppet to my tune instead.
In your blind emotional rush to regain position after I have continually humiliated you in the political arena, your only recourse left was to engage in the banter one, as seen above. One in which you have also failed miserably as seen over the course of this conversation. The only thing you can mundanely muster repeatedly is; "Glen Beckkk", Faux News", Rxush", "Egghead" and "Wile E Coyote" - Ad Nauseum.
I have also noticed, and I'm sure others have by now, the only time you comment on political/social topic threads is to disrupt the hopefully objective information being discussed, with political rhetoric. We see this with your constant non-pertinent quips. My guess, since you seemingly lack any intelligent and/or relevant reply thus far, this is your only recourse to distract from it (hypocrisy, dangerous political polarization, unlawful dissent, ) being' brought to light' and discussed in any meaningful way.
Your modus operandi is no enigma to me.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS: It also looks like you are the type that feels the need to get the last word in to fulfill some sort of lacking interpersonal "need". Oddly, some people equate to getting in the last word to being correct in their position. Sort of like people yelling "racist" is some trump card that negates anything being said.
Being the understanding individual that I am (I let people have the last word in all the time because of this), I wasn't really being vicious (OK, maybe just a little) earlier when I mentioned I recognize your need to regain your sense of dignity. I even engaged you to give you ample opportunity, one which you sadly wasted laughably on outdated pop-culture references. With that said, and to return this thread on topic, I'm going to let you have at it. Don't disappoint.
Good luck next time and thanks for playing?!?!
I understand you cannot say it flat out because it will bruise your ego as other people are reading but I accept your surrender, which you present as spin. You emulate Donald Trump, who cannot admit fault in fear of being ridiculed just like yourself so I understand why you deliver your drivel in that style..
Only advice I will give you, do not quit your job in order to take that comedy act on the road, you will be homeless in just a couple days.
You are welcome in advance...