Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 12 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp
Restrictions: maximum total size 5120KB, maximum individual size 5120KB
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Ride The Lightning
« on: February 28, 2019, 07:38:05 pm »

Jeeebus, is she still around???  I used to call her Feinenstein...because she looked like Dr. Kervorkian built her in his laboratory...
Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 28, 2019, 07:33:41 pm »


I've asked several question you have failed to answer. I even asked again for you to answer them- you still refused.


Then you have the audacity to call me "closed mind(ed)". I don't think anyone would call somebody asking question's on a subject or somebodies view for more information, to be informed "close minded".



But good try on trying to bow out of the conversation , still refusing to answer them.



Cute.
What questions have you asked that I failed to answer?, to keep saying I and women have **** envy is a judgmental statement and implies that you do have a closed mind
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 28, 2019, 03:07:18 pm »

You keep saying the same things so its apparent you have a closed mind this conversation seems to just go in circles, I don't chase my own tail


I've asked several question you have failed to answer. I even asked again for you to answer them- you still refused.


Then you have the audacity to call me "closed mind(ed)". I don't think anyone would call somebody asking question's on a subject or somebodies view for more information, to be informed "close minded".



But good try on trying to bow out of the conversation , still refusing to answer them.



Cute.


Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 28, 2019, 12:52:43 pm »

Yes, I understand the truth of the matter is you feminist have pen!s envy and blaming a "boogieman" for your worsening problems since you got your failed "equality". Look at the explosion of single moms on welfare, with multiple kids by multiple men, broken absentee fatherless homes (sorry, I guess that's a victory?), hooked on drugs and welfare. Women have already been doing the other things you named. Feminism has pushed whole generations of other women in the gutter to satisfy their hatred of all thing male. - "feminism"


I asked you to name me what women have gained for their  "equality". You only managed to name 2 things; Voting and 'got rid of men'.


"anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses"- You are pro-Obama/liberal.  "Obamacare" is THE most intrusive governmental program into women's healthcare. What are you even blabbering about. That CG acting up again?
You keep saying the same things so its apparent you have a closed mind this conversation seems to just go in circles, I don't chase my own tail
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 28, 2019, 10:28:36 am »

I have to repeat it because that's the truth of the matter, its like you aren't seeing the forest for the tree's, I firmly believe that there is a group of old. white men who have an agenda and because they are extremely rich and powerful but only because they are rich not by any contribution they made to society. Have you heard of the Bilderberg group I think its the name, anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses, that simple

Yes, I understand the truth of the matter is you feminist have pen!s envy and blaming a "boogieman" for your worsening problems since you got your failed "equality". Look at the explosion of single moms on welfare, with multiple kids by multiple men, broken absentee fatherless homes (sorry, I guess that's a victory?), hooked on drugs and welfare. Women have already been doing the other things you named. Feminism has pushed whole generations of other women in the gutter to satisfy their hatred of all thing male. - "feminism"


I asked you to name me what women have gained for their  "equality". You only managed to name 2 things; Voting and 'got rid of men'.


"anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses"- You are pro-Obama/liberal.  "Obamacare" is THE most intrusive governmental program into women's healthcare. What are you even blabbering about. That CG acting up again?





Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 28, 2019, 09:18:30 am »

"those old white rich men"-J50   I think you repeating these anti-male sentiments says everything we need to know about your hypocrisy and feigned moral superiority of "equality".


I also don't remember making a comment where I was forcing anyone to do anything. So, if you could point that out where I did, maybe we can sort your confusion out. I did however, make a statement on what nature/God intended women to do comparative to your statement that "white christian males who wanted to end abortion, causing an explosion in welfare ho's.", that you made at the beginning of this conversation.  Maybe you forgot that's what this discussion was about?


If you can't remember what is being discussed and why, it will be futile to continue on any further.
I have to repeat it because that's the truth of the matter, its like you aren't seeing the forest for the tree's, I firmly believe that there is a group of old. white men who have an agenda and because they are extremely rich and powerful but only because they are rich not by any contribution they made to society. Have you heard of the Bilderberg group I think its the name, anyway Government stay out of womens uteruses, that simple
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 27, 2019, 10:42:05 pm »

Comparing women to black people, was that an after thought or trying to tie your nonsensical thoughts into a semblance of a point. I never implied women always had a man but societies attitude was women married, raised the kids and kept the house and I think other than being able to vote which if you really think about it our vote doesn't count, nobody's does except those old white rich men who have the power. And once again I don't disdain men I disdain this self entitled attitude but I don't exclude others who have it like young people and lazy people, most of humanity actually like I said before I disdain everybody so me being a man hater isn't the issue. It wasn't women who called it the sexual revolution society called it that. And more Ho moms being produced?, really you should be happy about that after all you are forcing others to comply with that you think is best for them, ah the arrogance of man such a musky smell

"those old white rich men"-J50   I think you repeating these anti-male sentiments says everything we need to know about your hypocrisy and feigned moral superiority of "equality".


I also don't remember making a comment where I was forcing anyone to do anything. So, if you could point that out where I did, maybe we can sort your confusion out. I did however, make a statement on what nature/God intended women to do comparative to your statement that "white christian males who wanted to end abortion, causing an explosion in welfare ho's.", that you made at the beginning of this conversation.  Maybe you forgot that's what this discussion was about?


If you can't remember what is being discussed and why, it will be futile to continue on any further.





 



Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 27, 2019, 10:00:22 pm »

Like black people, you women want an award for any and everything you do, it's like watching the special  Olympics. It truly is.

You act like women never survived without a man before. You think every woman on this earth always had a man, or wasn't widowed and still had to survive?  My God, you are so naive.  And your disdain for men blinds you that women gained nothing.

Sadly, more and more  "ho" moms are being produced, despite your claim that it's the "loon white christian male ending abortion" going to cause it. Remember, you feminist called this the "sexual revolution". Least your cognitive dissonance is giving way and allowing you, even if it's only subconsciously, to admit the problem (truth) to yourself. Today hasn't been a total waste.
Comparing women to black people, was that an after thought or trying to tie your nonsensical thoughts into a semblance of a point. I never implied women always had a man but societies attitude was women married, raised the kids and kept the house and I think other than being able to vote which if you really think about it our vote doesn't count, nobody's does except those old white rich men who have the power. And once again I don't disdain men I disdain this self entitled attitude but I don't exclude others who have it like young people and lazy people, most of humanity actually like I said before I disdain everybody so me being a man hater isn't the issue. It wasn't women who called it the sexual revolution society called it that. And more Ho moms being produced?, really you should be happy about that after all you are forcing others to comply with that you think is best for them, ah the arrogance of man such a musky smell
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 27, 2019, 03:16:53 pm »

We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's

Like black people, you women want an award for any and everything you do, it's like watching the special  Olympics. It truly is.

You act like women never survived without a man before. You think every woman on this earth always had a man, or wasn't widowed and still had to survive?  My God, you are so naive.  And your disdain for men blinds you that women gained nothing.

Sadly, more and more  "ho" moms are being produced, despite your claim that it's the "loon white christian male ending abortion" going to cause it. Remember, you feminist called this the "sexual revolution". Least your cognitive dissonance is giving way and allowing you, even if it's only subconsciously, to admit the problem (truth) to yourself. Today hasn't been a total waste.
Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 27, 2019, 02:15:59 pm »


Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, prostitution and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.
We are the cause of our problems, men included its not rational to put a gender label on it. And if you cant see the fact that being liberated from being dependent on someone and it doesn't have to just be a man because being self sufficient is very liberating, not having to depend on another person for your survival surpasses and is the sum total of what women have accomplished, you seem to want to trivialize that for some reason. And there are many single mom's, as well as dad's out there that aren't drug addicts and on welfare. So really the only point in proving is your narrow mindedness and even that I think is mostly to try to get some emotional response from me, if that's the case will you sleep better if I was gnashing my teeth and bashing my head against the computer screen. And no objectively speaking we did not give up more than we gained unless you have been talking to some lazy ass ho who doesn't want to be self sufficient then maybe that statement might be applicable but then again who wants to be surrounded by lazy ass ho's
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 27, 2019, 01:37:10 pm »

Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich


Well, I'm glad you know there is truth in the fact women are the cause of their own problems. You admitting this will be the first step in curing your situation.


Yes, we established you women "get to vote", and that seems to be the only thing you accomplished with your "equality". You haven't mentioned anything else or anything new women have done.  Minus the "we got rid of men thing" you keep going on about still, "we don't need a man to survive"- J50.


This seems to be the ongoing theme of your and other feminists purpose of "equality".  This is the 3rd or 4th time you have mentioned this. Why mention this if you weren't competing with the man, to become a "man" by doing what a man does? Every one of your statements have an underlying "anti-male" slant to them.


"our species is more than that" -J50      The funny thing you saying that is, that's your biological programmed nurturing shining thru past your pen!s envy and not even knowing or understanding it. My point, Proven.


I think I have proved my point thoroughly enough and you're stuck on "we vote", "got rid of men", and if you can't add anything more than that. Objectively speaking, women definitely gave up more than what they think they gained.  The explosion of single moms, welfare, drug addicts, multiple kids by multiple men, broken home, prostitution and kids shooting each other says more than I ever could. Which makes your comment "and we can still raise our kids" that much more scary that you are so diluted in your thinking you actually believe it.

Like I said, if this is the fruits of your "equality", it stands more as a warning against it. Sad.



Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 27, 2019, 12:38:53 pm »

That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question
Play it off as a joke but we both know it has a certain element of truth to it. And back in the day how many women doctors were there, that is the answer to your question, voting is just one of the things women received, we and for me I think this is what sticks in your craw the most is we don't need a man to survive, we can be self sufficient and dependable, we are able to take care of ourselves and our kids, people shouldn't be cast in any roles or have any labels because we as a species are more than that, I did find what you said rather amusing and I did go to the kitchen and fixed myself a sandwich
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 27, 2019, 11:48:29 am »

Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have **** envy because I don't need one perhaps you have **** envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you

That last part was a joke. No sense of humor - Hairy leg feminist : CONFIRMED.

The point is, and your proved it, the female in nature raises the kid, not the male. These facts are undeniable.

Also, "back-in-the-day" people practiced "family medicine" and didn't run off to the emergency room (doctor) for any or every little thing. I don't know where you're getting your information from, since you never answered my question





Posted by: joanna50
« on: February 27, 2019, 11:28:17 am »


Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.
Well it seems like you like passing the buck, the reason you see young offspring around the mom is because she feeds them, no any other reason. I don't have **** envy because I don't need one perhaps you have **** envy. And that crap about there weren't a lot of doctors is  not making any logical sense, they were in high demand. Now I know you are probably tramautized cause your hero Trump is about to have a come to Jesus moment so I will chalk all this crazy talk up to emotional distress, oh and that last part was classy, you made my point thank you
Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: February 27, 2019, 11:01:33 am »

I did not realize I had to be literal when I spoke about women weren't CEO's or doctors, I correct that to mean perhaps maybe 2 in a million, ffs you know what I meant yet your grasping at straws in trying to make a valid point is cute. You keep blathering on about this **** envy thing, why should women be envious we don't need it, its just a appendage not really useful in the big scheme of things, convince me I am wrong and why I am envious of something I don't need. Our sons are shooting up schools because the parents aren't teaching them morals and values, if you look at why the shootings occur you will see the crux of the problem lies with bullying, not being raised by a single parent heck when 2 cant even do the job


Ah, the age old "Honey, why didn't you read my mind instead of listening to what I actually said", female syndrome. I'm not even....

OK, where did this "2 in a million" number come from? Did you make it up  or do you have any valid reason to say this number? 100-150 years ago medicine wasn't big commercial business, so I'd expect it to be low anyways given hospitals weren't so wide spread.

Why do women have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really. They don't have one.   Next question.

Why do you have pen!s envy?  Well, it's quite simple really (I'll let you guess). I mean, unless there is something you're not telling us? 

 Truthfully, I can only psychoanalyze you so much. The reason for your deep-seated hatred (dislike)of men is probably due to your poor life choices and wanting to blame someone (males) for the consequences you had to endure, would be my educated guess. Typical human nature stuff.

Nobody teaching our kids morals and standards. Don't you think that's hard to do with no mother at home who traditionally did that? Biologically women are programmed to be nurturers, this is what women "rock at". Men, not so much. Biologically we're authority figures. We even see this within the animal kingdom. The young offspring always huddle around with the mom.   So when you (women) fail to do what nature INTENDED you to do, the family unit falls apart. A strong family unit is the base building block of a civilization. 

If shooting  others is blamed on being bullied. I'm not surprised that a wife is more than likely to be killed by her husband than a stranger. Maybe you should STFU and get your ass3s back into the kitchen.   PROBLEM. SOLVED.


That will be $100 for this 15 minute session. I accept Paypal.