Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 12 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp
Restrictions: maximum total size 5120KB, maximum individual size 5120KB
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Weepy
« on: March 10, 2019, 08:14:46 pm »

LMAO the madam is gonna have to come to DC and testify to congress..
Posted by: Der Fuehrer
« on: March 09, 2019, 10:18:46 am »

Posted by: Window Lickers Union
« on: March 09, 2019, 08:03:21 am »

Why is this even news?  (rhetorical)


The woman hasn't owned that spa since 2013 and hasn't been charged in connection with it's trafficking. Then the tinfoil hat brigade talking about how she "showed little political interest" and "not voted the 10 years prior to 2016", like it's some sort of conspiracy.   


This comes across like a political hit piece to vilify the Trump administration with being guilty by association.



Is this what passes for news these days. Sensationalism.