Post reply

Warning - while you were reading 3 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 12 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp
Restrictions: maximum total size 5120KB, maximum individual size 5120KB
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Tutu
« on: April 07, 2022, 01:48:24 pm »

I think it's now time to discuss Trump's mental state. How does he feel about money laundering? I wonder.
Maybe like a doofus? idk
Posted by: positronium
« on: February 26, 2022, 11:11:11 am »

I think it's now time to discuss Trump's mental state. How does he feel about money laundering? I wonder.
Posted by: Groot
« on: February 13, 2022, 08:47:44 am »

Trum is nuts!
Posted by: positronium
« on: September 27, 2020, 07:23:21 pm »

I've never seen a person write so much without saying anything of substance.
Somewhat Reminds me of AOC on the old topix.....
Posted by: NC Yankee
« on: September 24, 2019, 01:53:30 pm »

Go read a book on persuasive writing.  If all I had to do was say the other side is effing stupid anyone could do my job.  If all I had to do is say the other side thinks this in conclusory fashion when the other side has articulated their position using facts and reason and what they have articulated doesn't correspond to my bare conclusory statement, anyone could do my job.

So if you have a conclusion about what the other side thinks or feels and you want to be persuasive, you either better support that conclusion with facts and reason or the other side better do that for you (and rarely are they going to do so in a manner that favors you) and your conclusions should match the facts and reason presented.  Just stating a bare conclusion by itself means nothing, however.
Posted by: NC Yankee
« on: September 24, 2019, 01:43:26 pm »

Roll the dice ... I also have to proof read when I do my work, but not on here. 
Posted by: NC Yankee
« on: September 24, 2019, 01:42:20 pm »

Have you ever read the works of NC Yankee?

Yes.  Naturally they are filled with facts, reason, and enlightenment.  If I wrote like you boys do, I couldn't even do my job.  I frequently have to be persuasive when writing and can't say I'm right cause the other side a dumb or I'm right cause I said so or just use conclusory statements.  I have to support everything I am arguing with specificity and facts and reason, if want to prevail.  Sometimes you can't reason with stupid though and I've had to appeal a number of cases in my field and I have never lost an appeal that I can recall. If I know I have a dog **** arguments I will say the other person is right and let's not waste money on this unless it's so important that we want to role the dice and fight for it knowing we aren't probably going to win.  This is what I do for a living.  The way you arrive you could never work in the legal profession in an adversarial role where you have to convince either your adversary or an adjudicator that you are right.  I have been doing it for 20 years now.
Posted by: Realtime
« on: September 24, 2019, 01:14:28 pm »

I've never seen a person write so much without saying anything of substance.
Have you ever read the works of NC Yankee?
Posted by: NC Yankee
« on: September 24, 2019, 12:34:40 pm »

More critique? Yawn

Rebuttal to what? You didn't say anything.

I've never seen a person write so much without saying anything of substance.
Posted by: Mark J
« on: September 23, 2019, 09:24:51 pm »

More critique? Yawn

Rebuttal to what? You didn't say anything.

Nothing to say,  yet you can't help but say it.  No surprise there.
Posted by: Teaman
« on: September 23, 2019, 08:35:18 pm »

No actual rebuttal? Nothing but the same old right winger retort we have heard from hundreds,  for years?

It is not even fun to beat you folks up in chat boards anymore, I have not seen anything original out of you righties since 2008.

The only question left is which ones of you are brain-dead and brainwashed,, and which are evil trolls.

However it can still be fun to cut you righties off at the knees in waiting rooms. I smoked a half a dozen of you at the tire store the other week. Facts are not your strong suit and you righties tend to brain-lock when your BS is challenged in person.

More critique? Yawn

Rebuttal to what? You didn't say anything.
Posted by: Realtime
« on: September 23, 2019, 06:11:58 pm »

No actual rebuttal? Nothing but the same old right winger retort we have heard from hundreds,  for years?

It is not even fun to beat you folks up in chat boards anymore, I have not seen anything original out of you righties since 2008.

The only question left is which ones of you are brain-dead and brainwashed,, and which are evil trolls.

However it can still be fun to cut you righties off at the knees in waiting rooms. I smoked a half a dozen of you at the tire store the other week. Facts are not your strong suit and you righties tend to brain-lock when your BS is challenged in person.
Didja know that they have Sherpa Law in Michigan and Minnesota?
Posted by: Mark J
« on: September 23, 2019, 04:56:20 pm »

A critique? No ideas of your own?

No actual rebuttal? Nothing but the same old right winger retort we have heard from hundreds,  for years?

It is not even fun to beat you folks up in chat boards anymore, I have not seen anything original out of you righties since 2008.

The only question left is which ones of you are brain-dead and brainwashed,, and which are evil trolls.

However it can still be fun to cut you righties off at the knees in waiting rooms. I smoked a half a dozen of you at the tire store the other week. Facts are not your strong suit and you righties tend to brain-lock when your BS is challenged in person.
Posted by: Teaman
« on: September 23, 2019, 04:05:51 pm »

Just years of talking to right wingers.  Funny how you all claim to be original yet are so akin that you could be clones.
I used to listen to rush just so I would know in advance what opinions you folks would be spouting that afternoon.

A critique? No ideas of your own? 
Posted by: Mark J
« on: September 23, 2019, 11:31:45 am »

Lol! A lot of projection there.

Just years of talking to right wingers.  Funny how you all claim to be original yet are so akin that you could be clones.
I used to listen to rush just so I would know in advance what opinions you folks would be spouting that afternoon.